The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares five cities in Australia in terms of coffee and tea buying and drinking habits of their residents.
It is clear that the percentage of residents who bought fresh coffee was the lowest in five Australian cities. Overall, inhabitants preferred going to a café for coffee or tea to buying instant coffee.
Looking at the percentage of city residents who bought fresh coffee, we can see that people in Sydney had the highest proportion, at around 44%, while the lowest figures for Brisbane and Adelaide stood at about 34%. Furthermore, Sydney, Melbourne and Hobart had the highest number of people who went to café to drink coffee or tea, at 61%, 64%, 63% respectively.
People in Adelaide tend to drink or buy coffee and tea with the lowest percentages. In other four cities, we can also see that the percentage of people who buy instant coffee in the last four week had the second positions in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, and Hobart, with the respective figures were 46%, 48%, 53%, and 54%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-12 | Daniel3003 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | susanti | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | anhalice | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Kaythlyn | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-27 | Jessie1526 | view |
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops 73
- In some countries owing a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 56
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 78
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 73
- The graph below shows changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, look, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 846.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86206896552 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53721150053 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1880951876 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.857142857 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217347231976 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126026441193 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757364578958 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159737505875 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707021844533 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.