it is more imporatnt for humans to use land resources to build houses farms factories than to save endangered species
By and large, it is established beyond fact that humans need well organized socoiety and flourished environment to reside. Vividly, human's population and steady growth can be accomplished by number of factors. In this regard, provision of resources and locations are of paramount importance. There are different schools of thoughts among researchers where some consider that protection of endangered animals is of critical importance, whereas others contemplate that human needs play utmost role. As for this writer's opinion, I would subscribe to the latter. I will delve into most crucial reasons to substantiate my viewpoints.
First reason coming to my mind to elucidate my standpoint is associated with the fact that as the growth of human is surpassing the limit in an area. people face dearth of residence. In order to occomodate extensive population, land is required.It is worth mentioning that people living in conjusted places suffers from certain ailments sich as breathing problems and other diseases which spread because of contamination. Due to the reason that people donot have access to the fresh water and air. Building houses and apartment complexes will alleviate the problem. In addition, development of factories on piece of land provide employment opportunities to people that would raise their living standard. On the other hand it land was not provided, humans are deprived of such facilities which are their basic rights. It is csrytal clear to see why land use for humans are extremely important.
Second rationale behind my reason is rooted in the notion that human need crops growth and thus need land for their farms. If we donot clear the land and just provide habitat for animals, then there will be no human left. To be more clear, A place without humans are forest or zoo. Considering importance of land for humans its clear to see that if people donot have forms then they will suffer. For the sake of illustration, last year , I had a chance to go to Africa. I was astronished to see the misery of people living there. They donot have enough food and resources to live. People are dying because of hunger. I am not saying that animals are not important but in this dire situation human needs more attention. By growing the crops we can serve humanity. For instance, we can send foor resources to places where people are dying because of lack of resources.
By perusing above pargraphs, one can infer that provision of land for human is critically importnat. For the sake of brevity, few points are worth reiterating.Firstl, in order to occomadate extensive growth of people, humans needs place to live and establish. Second, clearing land would provide an opportunity to grow the crops and decline the hunger.As for writer's opinion, I vehemently urge people to consider human need first, as we cannot outweights the human survival over animal safety.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-01-23 | Attia Yaqoob | 75 | view |
- Wild tuna a species of large ocean fish have decreased in number because of overfishing Recently attempts have been made to farm tuna by feeding the fish in ocean cages until they become large enough for sale However tuna farming has faced several problem 76
- It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts 90
- it is more imporatnt for humans to use land resources to build houses farms factories than to save endangered species 75
- it is beter to go on trip by oneself or with tour guide 73
- Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth century Dutch painters However there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him One such painting is known as Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet The pa 83
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 510, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...man needs play utmost role. As for this writers opinion, I would subscribe to the latte...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 150, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...man is surpassing the limit in an area. people face dearth of residence. In order to o...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 245, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
... extensive population, land is required.It is worth mentioning that people living ...
^^
Line 2, column 725, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lands'?
Suggestion: lands
...r living standard. On the other hand it land was not provided, humans are deprived o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... For the sake of illustration, last year , I had a chance to go to Africa. I was a...
^^
Line 4, column 159, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Firstl
...evity, few points are worth reiterating.Firstl, in order to occomadate extensive growt...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 352, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...o grow the crops and decline the hunger.As for writers opinion, I vehemently urge ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, then, thus, well, whereas, as for, for instance, in addition, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2412.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 476.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06722689076 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77684173937 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523109243697 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 751.5 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.4311854785 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1428571429 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.32142857143 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235955691666 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622232946365 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472205776165 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145808327482 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282849848238 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 510, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...man needs play utmost role. As for this writers opinion, I would subscribe to the latte...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 150, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...man is surpassing the limit in an area. people face dearth of residence. In order to o...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 245, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
... extensive population, land is required.It is worth mentioning that people living ...
^^
Line 2, column 725, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lands'?
Suggestion: lands
...r living standard. On the other hand it land was not provided, humans are deprived o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... For the sake of illustration, last year , I had a chance to go to Africa. I was a...
^^
Line 4, column 159, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Firstl
...evity, few points are worth reiterating.Firstl, in order to occomadate extensive growt...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 352, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...o grow the crops and decline the hunger.As for writers opinion, I vehemently urge ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, then, thus, well, whereas, as for, for instance, in addition, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2412.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 476.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06722689076 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77684173937 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523109243697 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 751.5 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.4311854785 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1428571429 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.32142857143 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235955691666 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622232946365 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472205776165 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145808327482 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282849848238 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.