Life today is much more comfortable than life your parents have lived.
Life today is much more comfortable than life your parents have lived.
By and large, it is established beyond facts that there is nothing constant in this temporary world. World structure and condditions are drastically changed with time period. In this regard, advancement in technology is of paramount importance. There are different school of thoughts amongst scholars that living 50 years ago was more comfortable or living in contemporary world is much more feasible. If I were asked, I would subscribe to the latter idea. I will delve into the following reasons to substantiate my viewpoints.
The first rationale behind my reason is rooted in the fact that with the advent of technology and advancement in a society our live is of 360 degree change compared to our parents. To be more specific, we can enjoy education, medical facilities, agricultural advancement. Vividly, internet has brought a breakthrough in individual’s life. Not only our life became comfortable, our work became efficient too. Computers share more than half of human workload. people today can cherish variety of communication and transportation facilities. By way of illustration, I am a pharmacist who drives my own car to my work, living in a luxurious house, my kids are getting education from expensive private school. My husband works for a big firm who provides him with medical and car insurance. Not to mention, it would be a dream come true for a person who lived in the past. It is axiomatic that living without electricity, all these technologies and advancement life could be extremely difficult. People have limited fiancial resources and were forced to forced to burn the candle by hard working. Transportation was not available and existence of phones and internet was out of question. For instance, my dad had a bicycle, which he rode to go to his farm and did hard work during the whole day. People had to feed their whole families in small income and my mom could not do job because it was not considered appropriate back then. It is crystal clear to see that living in modern day world is far more easy
The second compelling reason to elucidate my point of view is associated with the issue that in the past people had to strive hard for their life.
BY perusing the above paragraphs, one can infer that living today is extremely comfortable. For the sake of brevity, a couple of points are worth reiterating. First living today provides myriad of advantages. Second, life in the past was full of arduous tasks and hardships.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 459, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...share more than half of human workload. people today can cherish variety of communicat...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1039, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...have limited fiancial resources and were forced to forced to burn the candle by h...
^^
Line 5, column 1041, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'forced to'.
Suggestion: forced to
...ve limited fiancial resources and were forced to forced to burn the candle by hard working. Transp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, then, for instance, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2117.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 426.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96948356808 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92352680352 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56338028169 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7640595933 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.4230769231 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3846153846 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11538461538 5.45110844103 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335091514536 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864655736125 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16551578425 0.0737576698707 224% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276795140944 0.150856017488 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.29312753947 0.0645574589148 454% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 459, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...share more than half of human workload. people today can cherish variety of communicat...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1039, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...have limited fiancial resources and were forced to forced to burn the candle by h...
^^
Line 5, column 1041, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'forced to'.
Suggestion: forced to
...ve limited fiancial resources and were forced to forced to burn the candle by hard working. Transp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, then, for instance, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2117.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 426.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96948356808 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92352680352 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56338028169 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7640595933 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.4230769231 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3846153846 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11538461538 5.45110844103 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335091514536 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864655736125 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16551578425 0.0737576698707 224% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276795140944 0.150856017488 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.29312753947 0.0645574589148 454% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.