Parents should spend more time with their children helping them with their homework. Agree/disagree?
It is often argued that the parents-child relationship can only be built by spending time with the kids. I totally agree with this viewpoint that the parents should spend more time with their children by helping them with their homework.
Firstly, the children who are taught by their parents will be more focused. So the parents will know the strengths and weakness. Therefore, such children cannot fool their parents. Also, sometime students are hesitant to ask doubts in front of the whole class. For instance, introvert students will specifically benefit from home tutoring as they might feel shy to ask their doubts in front of other pupils. Hence, it would be beneficial for the kids.
On the other hand parents will get a chance to get involved in the daily routine of their kids. This would ensure that they would spend least one hour from their busy routine to get involved with their kids and that too in a productive activity every day. Furthermore, spending time with kids in doing school work will ensure that the parents know the likes and dislikes towards particular subjects which would ensure that they can help them pave the way for their future career aspirations. For instance, if a parent spends his/her time in helping with their child’s paperwork then why would get a rough idea that the kid is better in math or science stream.
Furthermore, adolescents often get carried away in peer pressure to get involved in drugs and uncensored video activities. If their parents would spend time with them and make them understand the consequences then it would significantly reduce the chances of falling prey to such activities in their teenage.
In conclusion, I believe that time is the biggest asset that parents could give to their children. By spending time in solving the assignments they not only help them in building career but also a bond of love and respect towards each other that would last for a lifetime. Would the parents of this generation understand this? Still remains a question.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-04 | ankita.hpgdc | 56 | view |
| 2021-01-28 | ankita.hpgdc | 56 | view |
- Some people think that it is better to educate boys and girls in separate schools Other however believe that boys and girls benefit more from attending mixed schools Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise pollution and airport constuction One reason for this is the growth in low cost passenger flights often to holiday destinations Some people say that government should try to reduce air traffic by taxing it 73
- Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic The idea of having a single career is becoming an old fashioned one The new fashion will be to have several careers or ways of earning money and f 73
- People across the world are more similar than they are different To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a parent' or simply 'parents'?
Suggestion: a parent; parents
...eve that time is the biggest asset that a parents can give to their children. By spending...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, so, still, then, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91812865497 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51880516658 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497076023392 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4750573153 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4444444444 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94444444444 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.509232946857 0.244688304435 208% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166638432226 0.084324248473 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.189792380127 0.0667982634062 284% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.328828069484 0.151304729494 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.195675087928 0.056905535591 344% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a parent' or simply 'parents'?
Suggestion: a parent; parents
...eve that time is the biggest asset that a parents can give to their children. By spending...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, so, still, then, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91812865497 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51880516658 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497076023392 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4750573153 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4444444444 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94444444444 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.509232946857 0.244688304435 208% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166638432226 0.084324248473 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.189792380127 0.0667982634062 284% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.328828069484 0.151304729494 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.195675087928 0.056905535591 344% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.