benefits of going green
Both reading and the lecture are about going green to save the environment. In the reading, the author strongly postulates the beneficial effects of going green on the earth as well as people living in it and provides three reasons to support its idea. On the other hand, although the professor agrees that going green is advantageous, he does not support the reasons by stating that there are some factors to be considered before going green and gainsays each of the reasons mentioned in the reading.
First and foremost, the passage begins by asserting that industrial waste causes irreversible damage to the environment. By reducing the number of waste products, environmental pollution can be controlled and one way to limit pollution is by going green. However, the professor excerpts that a large quantity of population and companies are involved in producing waste. Environmental pollution can not be reduced unless a majority of people and companies worldwide join forces to work together for reducing waste. Therefore, the effort of society as a whole is needed in order to achieve a pollution-free environment.
Next, the professor further points into details that the cost of eco-friendly products is high as compare to non-recycleable substances. Even if the companies sell recyclable products, the customers prefer to buy cheap stuff. Hence, it is not good for the company's profit. The professor gave an example of a coffee shop that sold eco-friendly straws and as a result, lost its customers because people preferred low priced plastic straws. Thus, by selling environmentally friendly stuff the companies will not make a profit. These claims refute the writer's implication about going green helps in increasing the profit of companies. Moreover, it is mentioned in the reading that a survey conducted by people showed that they tend to buy eco-friendly products more. So, it will indulge companies to make more money by going green.
Ultimately, the article wraps its argument by declaring that going green saves money for people. The utilization of energy-saving systems reduces the consumption of resources, thus, reducing their cost. For instance, the usage of solar panels reduces electricity, helping individuals to save the planet and money in the meantime. In contrast, the professor rebuts this idea by showing the inaccuracy of the author that it will increase the cost more since the value of energy-saving systems is extremely high including installation and repair expenses. Solar panels are costly and also requires maintanance which as a sum increases the overall cost. Thereby, going green is expensive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-08 | bhaskar1325 | 70 | view |
| 2021-09-08 | bhaskar1325 | 70 | view |
| 2021-09-08 | bhaskar1325 | 70 | view |
| 2021-09-08 | bhaskar1325 | 73 | view |
- Ways to reduce salinity in SAlton lake 73
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to sc 70
- Advantages of casein based plastic 42
- Cloud seeding 80
- Fiction or non fiction 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 478, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'working'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: working
...ple and companies worldwide join forces to work together for reducing waste. Therefore,...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 549, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
... make a profit. These claims refute the writers implication about going green helps in ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in contrast, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 30.3222958057 171% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2226.0 1373.03311258 162% => OK
No of words: 419.0 270.72406181 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31264916468 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.04702891845 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94791818617 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 145.348785872 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522673031026 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 419.366225166 164% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 13.0662251656 168% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0512340813 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.181818182 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0454545455 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251365287176 0.272083759551 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904024502934 0.0996497079465 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127046318629 0.0662205650399 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164965752908 0.162205337803 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105258054655 0.0443174109184 238% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 63.6247240618 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.