The graph shows the avarage growth in domestic products in wealthy countries, countries that have adopted a global approach to business and countries that have not.
The bar chart illustrates data on the medium development of domestic goods in wealthy countries, globalisers and non-globalisers which were related to the business.
It is noticeable that, the annual Gross Domestic Product increased considerably in rich countries at the beginning of the year. However, the globalisers were seen completely growth throughout the survey. There were an oscillation of increasing domestic goods in non-globalisers.
According to the information given, just over 4.7% of domestic products climbed enormously and figures for the profuse countries in 1960. Besides, the lowest level observed in globalisers well over 1.4% and the domestic goods of the non-globalisers had doubled by almost 2.8% until jumping the highest percentage just over 3.5 %. Unfortunely, the yearly Domestic Gross Product of wealthly countries had plummed gradually from 2.9 % to 2.2 % in 1970. After, there had been a substantial rocket to 3.3 % in non-globalisers in 1970 when this trend had experiensed the least growth in all the given years.
Turning to the last year, the wealthy countries remained stable in the same level well over 2.0 %. Importantly, there was an enormous development of the globalisers which was peaked at 5.0 % in 1990. Lastly, the growth on non- globalisers accounted for the average rose to 1.4 % respectively at the end of the year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-14 | Ben.Afshar | 75 | view |
| 2021-03-06 | Nurimov Elyor | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-18 | Lien Huynh | 80 | view |
| 2020-06-10 | Anh Thi | 73 | view |
| 2020-05-02 | myname95 | view |
- In some countries owning a home than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case 56
- The chart gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 2021 and future projections for 2025 92
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 73
- Nowadays technological devices such as smart phones tablets bring more disadvantage than advantage Do you agree or disagree 89
- The pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 426, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hly countries had plummed gradually from 2.9 % to 2.2 % in 1970. After, there had...
^^
Line 5, column 452, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...gradually from 2.9 % to 2.2 % in 1970. After, there had been a substantial rocket to...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, lastly, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1155.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44811320755 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17487241469 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580188679245 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6841712534 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.72727272727 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175630389731 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789728195432 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677896201385 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10885507935 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407474939452 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 426, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hly countries had plummed gradually from 2.9 % to 2.2 % in 1970. After, there had...
^^
Line 5, column 452, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...gradually from 2.9 % to 2.2 % in 1970. After, there had been a substantial rocket to...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, lastly, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1155.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44811320755 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17487241469 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580188679245 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6841712534 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.72727272727 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175630389731 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789728195432 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677896201385 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10885507935 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407474939452 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.