The maps shows changes in frenton city during 1992 to 2012
The given maps provide information about construction which took in Fenton city between 1990 and 2012.
Overall, it is seen clearly from both maps that the school and high street remained the same throughout the time, whereas the bank had been replaced by a restaurant.
To embarks with, in 1990, Playing fields were located on the north side, which had been transformed into blocks of flats. Meanwhile, the school, a library, and the High Street were unchanged during the given period, while houses from the south side were replaced by flats. Also, new flats were added on the north side, while the hospital’s building expanded in terms of its size.
Moreover, a theatre and shops in the south side of the city, which had been converted into a cinema in a supermarket respectively. Furthermore, trees from the Westside were cut down and a new technopark was built on that place, whereas a bank was replaced by a new restaurant. A cafe and park converted into a hotel and golf course, which is located near the high street and flats.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-10 | rajpatel90 | 11 | view |
- The pie charts show the destination of export goods in three countries in 2010
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia 100
- The table below shows the percentage participation of women in senior management in three companies between 1975 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The charts below show local government expenditure in 2010 and 2015
- The chart and graph below give information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, moreover, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83798882682 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54743702785 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54748603352 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.9285059911 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.25 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0658093811056 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0325069402761 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568548223249 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0600174182342 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682498125842 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.