some people say the most important thing of being rich is that it gives you the opportunity to help the poor. To what extent it is correct? Do you agree or disagree?
Many hold a belief that the most crucial thing about being wealthy is that it gives more chances to give a helping hand to the impoverished. This belief is partly right.
On the one hand, it is noteworthy that the provision of material relief is possible to the rich only. Nowadays, many studies have shown that in human's hierarchial demands, the needs for phisiology and finance are among the basic. Apart from these needs, people are craving for being useful to others, contributing to community. Only the rich who are financially wealthy enough can actualize this demand. For example, it is common that in developed countries and civilized society, billionaires are inclined to plough back to community charity organizations. Under the facade of being philanthropists, they are gaining psychological award for themselves. This example is the illustration of the fact that it is important for well-off to help others, which is multually beneficial.
On the other hand, the counter-argument raised by opponents to this is that giving assistance is essential to every individual, regardless of their financial status. This argument is reasonable to some extents. This is due to the fact that every human-being is longing for helping others. Meanwhile, it is common that, many countries fall victims to natural disasters on annual basis, those who wish to show empathy, compassion to survivors can help to accelerate the recovery process by donating their specialized knowledge in diffferent fields, ranking from medication to environment.
In conclusion, under no circumstance should people always try to give a hand to others whether they are wealthy or not.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many holds'.
Suggestion: Many holds
Many hold a belief that the most crucial thing ab...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, well, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17045454545 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91238124765 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560606060606 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 264.0 20.2975951904 1301% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1365.0 106.682146367 1280% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 264.0 20.7667163134 1271% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 83.0 7.06120827912 1175% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136737869513 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136737869513 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892102789619 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037447177648 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 134.9 13.0946893788 1030% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -204.94 50.2224549098 -408% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 107.4 11.3001002004 950% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.19 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 21.87 8.58950901804 255% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 57.0 9.78957915832 582% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 107.6 10.1190380762 1063% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 108.0 10.7795591182 1002% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.