Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this modern world, education has always been one of the most crucial factors contributing to the development of a nation. As a consequence, there has been many opinions about whether school curricula should be altered to include some community-based activities. This essay will outline some possible reasons for why this is an innovative proposal and finally introduce my own view.
First and foremost, community services help students realise some special values and qualities that cannot be conveyed through traditional subjects. For example, only by working for a charity could students be aware how lucky they are to have such good conditions and proper education, and as a result, they will grow a better sense of empathy. What is more, working to improve the conditions of the place where they live and grow up or teaching young children would be a great way to develop mutual care and understanding, enabling students to discover more interesting aspects of life - something that an overly-academic school could never accomplish.
However, there are some people who are against the inclusion of such communal activities, on the grounds that they are afraid of their interference with traditional school subjects. It is their point of view that those such as maths, English and IT are more necessary in the long run and are inevitable if they want to succeed in their workplace. Activities for the community should be, instead, allocated outside school curriculum under parental guidance.
In conclusion, despite some disadvantages it may brings, a curriculum with community-based services will ensure a more comprehensive development for students, especially in the aspect of social life. I hold the belief that this will be a great improvement for a currently over-theoretical program in high schools.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | phannhi1511@ | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Nhi3132006 | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | thuyan187 | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | ankhanhvien | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | trangiangtie | 73 | view |
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 89
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 89
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000 and the marital status of adult Americas in two of the years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rel 84
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural and land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and m 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...hat those such as maths, English and IT are more necessary in the long run and are ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34494773519 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08144805977 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613240418118 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.0542932623 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.454545455 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0909090909 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.54545454545 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249592616386 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920841576083 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527374728688 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143801640349 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327836417164 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.