TPO 6 integrated writing
The reading proposes that communal online encyclopedias is not reliable and authorize as printed version. However, the professor in the lecture disagrees with the author's opinion and points out that those ideas are due to prejudice and ignorance.
First of all, the reading passage asserts that communal online encyclopedia are often contain errors. Nevertheless, the lecturer contradicts the hypothesis. She states that none of the encyclopedias are perfect, and the errors can be found from both on and off the internet. Besides, the errors can be adjusted on the internet, but that of printed encyclopedias are remain decades.
Secondly, the reading passage suggests that hackers and vandals can delete and fabricate the content in online encyclopedias. Yet, the lecturer asserts that problems can be solve easily. There are two strategies. The first way is the unchanged format. The "read-only" function keep the information reliable. The second way is to hire special editors who monitor the modifiers and eliminate the errors.
Finally, the reading passage points out that communal encyclopedias are focus on trivia which can't present the most vital information to readers. Again, the lecture disagrees with the reading and claims that printed encyclopedias have limited space which are managing by few academic writers. Therefore, the printed encyclopedias are less diversified and can't reflect users interests.
- TPO 13 integrated writing 80
- TPO 15 independent writing Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to become financially responsible adults children should learn to manage their own money at a young age 60
- TPO5 independent writing Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do 66
- TPO 21 independent writing 3
- TPO 33 independent writing When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 76
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 20 in 30
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 15 12
No. of Words: 216 250
No. of Characters: 1177 1200
No. of Different Words: 118 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.834 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.449 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.778 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 100 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 81 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 46 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 28 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 14.4 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.238 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.324 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.525 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.064 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4