The charts give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
The charts demonstrate three age groups of the inhabitants of two nations which are Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
Overall, it is clear that the population of Yemen were considerately young in 2000 and this tendency is predicted to be fairly declined in the future. Conversely, Italian was much older in comparison with its counterpart and population aging is anticipated to grow in the next 50 years.
With regard to Yemen, percentage of children group (0-14 years) took account for half of the population, however, this group appears to see a small decrease in 2050, down to 37%. Whilst the group of teenager and middle age (15-59 years) is forecasted to rise by 11% and reach 57.3%. The senior group (60+ years) will also experience the similar trend.
Meanwhile, in Italy, both proportions of teenager and middle age group and children group will drop with estimated figures as 46.2% and 11.5% respectively. By contrast, the oldest group is going to increase significantly and hit 42.3% by 2050.
- The diagrams show the life circle of a species of large fish called salmon 73
- The charts give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 78
- It is generally believes that some people are born with certain talents for instance for sport or music and others are not However it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician Discuss both view and give y 78
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, however, if, so, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95906432749 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75901945728 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625730994152 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9819149705 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263135276638 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113738089172 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136094895197 0.0843802449381 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18917784764 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.159741463661 0.0819641961636 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.