It is generally believes that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.
Discuss both view and give your opinion.
There is no doubt some people are gifted in peculiar fields in which sports or music is popular. However, it is not rare that children can master any area if they are to learn and practice sufficiently. This essay examines this contentious question from both viewpoints and then states my own perspective.
On the one hand, it is true that our world has witnessed the live of a good number of people those who are blessed with natural talents. They have manifested signs of curiosity and enthusiasm in such an area at a very young age even before they are able to comprehend its essence and they are called genius. Genius is recognized in diversity from science field to athletics or artistic field but the most significant to be mentioned are sports and music. Great composers have ever walked the earth to be named are Mozart, Beethoven or Bach; turning to competitive game, Pele and Bobby Fischer are the symbols of football and chess respectively.
On the other hand, the quote “Practice makes perfect” is incontrovertible. When a child expresses his keenness on becoming a football player or a singer and he keeps enriching knowledge as well as reiterating action from time to time, he will conquer that subject regardless of innate talent. For instance, Cristiano Ronaldo is an alive evidence of a-practicing-sportsman since he was a very young and slim kid who was judged by people that he could never become a professional football player, not to mention that he is a superstar as today.
In conclusion, I believe both sides of the argument have their merits. Nevertheless, on balance, I gravitate towards the assertion that children, those who are taught and trained with proper methods and also invest adequate time in term of music or sports, can achieve the triumph which is often assumed to favor gifted people.
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 67
- the three charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s often assumed to favor gifted people.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, thus, well, as to, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91612903226 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89619938258 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632258064516 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.2305301993 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.25 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176594851466 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566767578656 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037255886446 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934759949311 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0194637832856 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.