It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to a remote natural environment such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages

Essay topics:

It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to a remote natural environment, such as the South pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

In this day and age, the question of whether the discovery of unknown eco areas bring human benefits or not has been raising public attention. While many people lament that there are tons of drawbacks, I agree that we have abundant reliable reasons to reach undiscovered natural places in the world.
In terms of benefits, human knowledge still needs to be widened, so it is critical to reach new zones on our planet. People can not cure many diseases prevailing namely cancel or covid 19, due to the shortage of herbals, which may be found somewhere far on the Earth. The more effort human beings make to discover the Earth, the more achievements they have in science.Moreover, some natural places are located in dangerous positions like near the active volcano or in the deep ocean, so that motivates scientists to create more modern technology to access these places. Therefore, this will also increase the living standard of citizens by creating more applicable products in real life. A mineral excavation revolution is going to be made in future, Great Powers need energy from fossil fuels to adapt their electricity using, army or even the economy, so finding new fertile land is the foremost task.
It is conspicuous that beside the given benefits, there are several drawbacks in this task. Natural destruction is the biggest criminal, which can endanger the wildlife animals’ habitat. In order to find new eco zones, human beings sometimes cut down trees to derive them into energy for mechanic purposes. But due to the high literacy levels, people know how the importance of the environment is, then we can avoid damaging nature. Foreseeable issues of discovering new eco places make people skeptical, but these problems can be solved easily.
Humans’ commission in future is the excavation of unknown eco lands in order to increase people’s living standard

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-06-04 tamle 11 view
2020-12-01 yaldaasgari 89 view
2019-09-29 astrlw@hotmail.com 39 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
In this day and age, the question of whether the discovery of unknown eco areas brin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es prevailing namely cancel or covid 19, due to the shortage of herbals, which ma...
^^
Line 2, column 369, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
... more achievements they have in science.Moreover, some natural places are located in da...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 413, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...over, some natural places are located in dangerous positions like near the active...
^^
Line 2, column 742, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...cavation revolution is going to be made in future, Great Powers need energy from fossil f...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09708737864 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66656847779 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62783171521 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1599074022 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.153846154 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7692307692 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0576880566586 0.244688304435 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0211758534028 0.084324248473 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0172361952401 0.0667982634062 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0326867221871 0.151304729494 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210612787471 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.