In some countries, young people have become richer, healthier, and live longer, but they are less happy. What are the causes? What can be done to address this situation?
In this modern era, people, especially the younger are now becoming wealthier, healthier and have a longer life expectancy, but in fact there has been a surprising decrease in reported levels of youngsters’ happiness. I believe there are some reasons for this phenomenon and actions should be taken into consideration.
The most vital cause is that numerous youngsters can not strike the balance between work and life. It is a noticeable fact that youngsters have to devote most of their time working on a daily basis to meet their decent job’s needs. As a result, they haven’t gotten around to doing something that helps them relieve from stress on a hectic day. Moreover, with the proliferation of the Internet, people have a tendency to pay too much attention to their phones for reasons of working, communicating, and entertaining. Without frequent face-to-face conversations and emotional communication, youngsters will feel alone, be isolated from their families, and less happy than before.
There are several solutions to be mentioned to solve this problem. First, they should reduce the workload by having a break and taking up some new hobbies. This would keep them engaged in something that they enjoy, help them take their mind off the stress of everyday life. Second, participating in sporting events is also an ideal way for people to improve their psychological states. For instance, some companies in Vietnam often operate a marathon race, offering many opportunities for employees to be physically and emotionally healthy as they could get to know each other.
In conclusion, it is understandable why people are still dissatisfied with several aspects of their lives, causing them to be unhappy. However, I believe that the aforementioned methods could have a contributing effect on solving this problem.
(290 words)
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-30 | MEBC Class | 100 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | QuynhAnh. | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | QuynhAnh. | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | Zeroplague0407 | 73 | view |
- Writing task 1 The chart below shows the percentages of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002 85
- In some countries young people have become richer healthier and live longer but they are less happy What are the causes What can be done to address this situation 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31740614334 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00668453527 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634812286689 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6100348272 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.285714286 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207064882118 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630189511319 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321688399906 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12604306846 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224050632014 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.