The chart below gives information about the purpose of visits to five cities in the UK in 2013.
The bar chart gives data about the aim of travels to five Uk cities in 2003.
Overall it is considerable that Holiday occupied largest proportion while other purposes proportion showed less percentage. Besides Business have had the least amount among others respectively.
In central city London had an expenditure of 50 compared to Edinburgh holiday that ranked at just below 70% while Manchester followed by 20. However the figure for Business is around 35 rather than Edinburgh which tripled although London business almost 10pecent higher . The other third aim stood at almost 20as well as in Edinburgh but Manchester is ten percent more . The last diagram the least in all cities mainly below 25% (8%, nearly 5% ,17%).
In contrast, the former initially stood at 19 as well as Business proportion in Liverpool . The latter is three times more in Bringmingham. Although visiting friends or relatives experienced higher proportion in two cities particularly comparison to Miscellaneous. Despite Bringmingham is illustrated a few , Liverpool is the same percentage as Business in that city.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-04 | conmeoconcao | 59 | view |
| 2021-07-04 | aligarxi90 | 71 | view |
- The chart below gives information about the purpose of visits to five cities in the UK in 2003 67
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city center from 2003 2012 50
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city center from 2003 2012 78
- The chart below gives information about the purpose of visits to five cities in the UK in 2013 71
- The table below shows the percentage use of four different fuel types to generate electricity in five Asian countries in 2005 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ow 70% while Manchester followed by 20. However the figure for Business is around 35 ra...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re for Business is around 35 rather than Edinburgh which tripled although London ...
^^
Line 5, column 271, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...h London business almost 10pecent higher . The other third aim stood at almost 20...
^^
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st 10pecent higher . The other third aim stood at almost 20as well as in Edinburg...
^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...burgh but Manchester is ten percent more . The last diagram the least in all citie...
^^
Line 5, column 445, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ll cities mainly below 25% 8%, nearly 5% ,17%. In contrast, the former initiall...
^^
Line 7, column 90, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...well as Business proportion in Liverpool . The latter is three times more in Bring...
^^
Line 7, column 307, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...espite Bringmingham is illustrated a few , Liverpool is the same percentage as Bus...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, so, third, well, while, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37209302326 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95052173563 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668604651163 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9397226037 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6363636364 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177929813069 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633927773283 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107295941388 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132874586976 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142293205857 0.0819641961636 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.