Lectures were used as a main method of teaching for the greater number of students in the past. With the existing technology, there is no longer any justification for that method. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With the development of the cutting/edge technology, giving lectures is believed to be outdated and should be abolished. I strongly disagree with this opinion and discussed below are several primary reasons which support my perspective.
To begin with, the core of teaching is the interaction between teachers and students. In other words, only by receiving lectures can students best develop their scholastic competence and characteristics; as a result, they can improve their academic results and better shape recognition of the world. Almost every country has applied this approach to education and they do not seem to be liable to get rid of it in the future. This directly suggests that there is no substitute to giving lectures as it is the key to convey information to students.
Another justification worth mentioning is that lessons taught by humans may be more appealing than those conducted by machines. To be specific, as humans have emotions and can control what they want to teach, they are able to attract more attention from students, which is impossible for computers and machines to do. Moreover, during the lessons, lecturers can also give advice based on their own experiences so listeners may put knowledge into practice more easily, whereas technology only consists of dry research, of which students can hardly reap benefits. For example, the humor of teachers may make students engrave the information in their mind longer than usual. What can be inferred from this is that human beings are superior to technology at equipping students with more interesting knowledge, thus helping them remember in the long run.
However, people who hold an opposite view consider that technology should replace the traditional teaching method. They point out that technology has a wider range of information and can provide high-resolution graphics, which may have a positive bearing on the understanding of students. However, technology cannot operate without the help of humans; consequently, machines should work with humans as their assistants. Otherwise stated, teachers and school organizers are necessitated to utilise technology to enhance the teaching quality.
In conclusion, I believe lectures play such an integral part in education that they cannot be replaced, and people should harness technology to assist them while giving lessons.
- The diagram below shows one method of manufacturing ceramic pots 78
- The pie charts below show a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years
- Some people think that children should start formal education at schools as early as possible others feel that the children should go to schools when they are at least seven years old Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The pie charts below show a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years
- In many countries people like to eat a wider variety of food than can be grown in the local area As a result much of the food today we eat has to come from other regions Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 421, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
...d work with humans as their assistants. Otherwise stated, teachers and school organizers ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2002.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4402173913 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9248170172 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58152173913 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.21059553 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.125 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177224451833 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586281924423 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0279167760713 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0883938202741 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328676677044 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.