The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates the scores of three teams, namely A, B, and C, over four consecutive seasons, starting from 2002.
Overall, team B got the most points among the three, whereas team C achieved a significantly lower score. Moreover, team B and C witnessed downward trends, which was the opposite for team A.
In 2002, team B scored 82 points, which was more than 8 times and 16 times higher than that of team C and team A, respectively. Team B, after having performed badly for three years, started to increase its points in 2005 and reached the number of 55 points. However, team A’s scores went in the opposite direction to team B, going up to 35 pounds in 2004 and then ended up with only 8 points one year later.
On the other hand, team C’s scores reached its peak in 2003 with 15 points, and leveled off to 5 points, being the lowest point of the graph and also the worst performer among the three two years later.
- The pie charts below show a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years
- Lectures were used as a main method of teaching for the greater number of students in the past With the existing technology there is no longer any justification for that method To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In some countries more and more adults are living with their parents after graduating from college University or even after finding a job Do the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 89
- As well as making money businesses have social responsibilities Do you agree or disagree 84
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A B and C over four different seasons Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ends, which was the opposite for team A. In 2002, team B scored 82 points, which ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, then, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 767.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48538011696 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32394158495 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608187134503 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 199.8 283.868780488 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4107097832 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.571428571 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141404019065 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763096541181 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0276714730837 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942523287712 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281067692338 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.96 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.