The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
The line graph illustrates the number of electrical appliances' owners changed and how much time was spent on doing domestic tasks in one country from 1920 to 2019.
Overall, it is clear that the usage of all three appliances experienced an upward trend over the period shown. The most dramatic change was seen in the refrigerator's use.
In 1920, people seem don't need to use a fridge in their house since it accounted for just nearly 0.1%. However, this figure had an exponential increase to 90% in the next two years before reaching its peak at 100% in 1980 and remaining stable for two years later. Washing machine and vacuum cleaner were highly used in the first year, at 40% and 30% respectively. The proportion of vacuum cleaner then steadily rose to 100% in 2000 and remained unchanged in the last year. In contrast, the one with a higher percentage went up to 70% before slightly dropped to around 64% in 1980 and took up the lowest proportion in 2019 compared to the two remainings, at approximately 72%.
In 1920, citizens spent half of their time doing domestic tasks. Nevertheless, this figure then had a deep fall to 20 hours in 1960 due to the fact that the technological revolution in home has started with the introduction of labour-saving appliances such as washing machine, vacuum cleaner,... The more equipment has been invented, the fewer people do the domestic work since the number of hours per week spent on housework continued to drop, at nearly 11 hours in 2019.
- Some people store personal and private information online including banking contacts and addresses Is it a positive or negative trend 84
- The charts show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 2014 84
- International travel is becoming cheaper and countries are opening their doors to more and more tourists Do the advantages of increased tourism outweigh disadvantages 61
- The diagram below describes how storm water is recycled in an Australian city 84
- People are living in a throwaway society using things for a short time and then throwing them away What are the causes of this What problems does it lead to 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 22, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...igerators use. In 1920, people seem dont need to use a fridge in their house sin...
^^^^
Line 7, column 292, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
... such as washing machine, vacuum cleaner,... The more equipment has been invented,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, nevertheless, then, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1240.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 258.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80620155039 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67787665437 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 106.607317073 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612403100775 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2121902395 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.727272727 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199406635399 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756751845714 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101840505583 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147082935056 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124802002674 0.0819641961636 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.