Some people think the newly built houses should be the same as the old house style in local areas. Others argue that local authorities should allow people to build houses in their own styles. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There are several ways to renovate a house in a neighbourhood. Some people weigh in with the idea of restoring the established designs while others who side with individualism support for originality in rebuilding those places. In my perspective, I am in favor of the prior argument for some reasons.
On one hand, the push behind the desire of one to create their own home is to express themselves to others. Firstly, they often seem to regard the place as a symbol of status. Such a unique place can help boast their high ranks in society. Secondly, living in a house that is tailored to their individuality could yield a sense of satisfaction of their hard-earned success. Soccerers like Ronaldo would love to have a large garage to house their collection of cars which they relish to celebrate their victories. Finally, some people with artistic mind often love to create styles that represent their personality to others.
On the other hand, rebuilding a house following its existing blueprint is important to some extent. A house that carries history with it should not be changed in any circumstances. Although it belongs to the present proprietor, it also serves as an social heritage that can help preserve the culture and tradition. For example, houses in Hoi An neighbourhood are historically built, therefore, the local authorities do not allow to change any of those to keep the area intact. In addition, restoring exact features of an old place would cost cheaper thanks to available facilities like water and gas pipeline.
In conclusion, individualizing a living place is what a person desires to do to express themselves to the outer world. It could be allowed if only that place does not have history infused and renovating it does not exceed one’s budget.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-10 | Leon_nguyen | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-25 | @hoangnguyen | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-18 | nguyenvosonghao | 95 | view |
| 2021-06-17 | anhsunrise | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-12 | oanhnth | 73 | view |
- Some people believe advertising causes more harm than good to society Others refute this Discuss both views and share your opinion 73
- Some people think the newly built houses should be the same as the old house style in local areas Others argue that local authorities should allow people to build houses in their own styles Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...e present proprietor, it also serves as an social heritage that can help preserve ...
^^
Line 5, column 430, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'changing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: changing
...ore, the local authorities do not allow to change any of those to keep the area intact. I...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8902417875 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580536912752 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4111766988 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.125 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3125 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253459457034 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723042097361 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610194878787 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125006675115 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665289300849 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.