Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In any domain to make significant contributions, one must consider the past achievements in that domain.
The issue suggests that, in any domain to make significanr contribution, one must consider the past achievements in that domain. In my openions, this might not be the case, past achievements do not play significant role in making significant contribution in that filed.
The depth of education and knowledge about a perticular domain and not the achievements or the awards received by the individual, plays an imprtant role in contrabuting in that field. One might have published several thesis and contension on a perticular topic, but does not attracts anyone's attention or praise.Also, the critics write negative statements about the pubished paper, then it does not mean that, the results or the statements that he has stated is completely agains the standard rules or he is a neophite in that domain. As research is published with provided proofs and supporthing references or surveys which help to justify the correctness of the statements made. Thus, we cannot soley depend upon the achievements in that field to significantly contribute in that field.
Having several achievements in a perticualr domain, does not mean that the individual might be a connosseur in that domain. He might have achieved some results through plagarism or copying the same results through some other research paper. Such type of bogus results do not prove subestiantial to be known as an achievements. For example, for a major project in university, a group of 5 members is made. Out of which only 4 of them put their individual efforts to complete their project and published a paper. Thus, as a group, they have an achievemnt in that field and even the society fells that all the members of croup have contributed in achieveing the goal, but that might not be the case. The one person who did not comtribute at all in solving any of the issues or errors during building of the project. Such type of false achievements cannot be considered in substential contibution in that domain.
Of course, one might say that, if a person considered pundit in perticular field who has achieved success in producing unique results and provides substential proofs to support them. Then such kind of past achievements will surely play an important role in contributing to that domain. Thus, one might consider past achivements to make substential contribution, but there is a catch, those past contributions shoubld be verified and scrutenised before considering them.
In conclusion, past achievements do not play signinificant role to make contribution in that domain, as the past achievements might be unwarrented or need to be verfied before considering them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-29 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-10-21 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 58 | view |
| 2024-10-04 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 53 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo from the Mayor of the city of Hillview In order to alleviate the serious unemployment problem in our town we should encourage Autotech automobile manufacturing plant in our area The Hillview landfill which has been undevel 57
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 58
- A recent sales study indicates that consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants has increased by 30 percent during the past five years Yet there are no currently operating city restaurants whose specialty is seafood Moreover the majority of fami 58
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 53
- Many governments have laws that ban the sale and use of hard drugs such as heroin and cocaine yet they allow people to buy drugs such as tobacco and alcohol Laws that prohibit the sale and use of hard drugs should be applied to all drugs including tobacco 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thesis seems to be countable; consider using: 'several theses'.
Suggestion: several theses
...in that field. One might have published several thesis and contension on a perticular topic, b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'attract'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: attract
...ion on a perticular topic, but does not attracts anyones attention or praise.Also, the c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'attract'
Suggestion: attract
...ion on a perticular topic, but does not attracts anyones attention or praise.Also, the c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Also
...ot attracts anyones attention or praise.Also, the critics write negative statements ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an achievement' or simply 'achievements'?
Suggestion: an achievement; achievements
... not prove subestiantial to be known as an achievements. For example, for a major project in un...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, thus, for example, in conclusion, kind of, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2218.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 430.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15813953488 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07945616911 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458139534884 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 678.6 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6175980955 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.222222222 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27777777778 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0766570155346 0.243740707755 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0286046638822 0.0831039109588 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030757257916 0.0758088955206 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0472371051724 0.150359130593 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02384751677 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.