The pie charts below show the different types of courses which were followed by the students during the years of 1984 1994 and 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The pie charts below show the different types of courses, which were followed by the
students during the years of 1984, 1994 and 2004. Summarize the information by
selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given pie charts provided the information about the proportion course which were selected by students throughout the three years like 1984, 1994 and 2004.
From the first pie chart it is clear that, face to face courses were most popular in the year of 1984. Around one in ten mixed media courses were pursued by students during this year. A minor number of school childrens were selected the correspondence courses, which was a fifth.
Second pie chat, face to face method decrease by 13 % and one more courses in involved in the year of 1994, which was about 11 % in it. It can be seen that the students did not change to followed the mixed media syllabus and correspondence syllabus during the time.
In 2004, face-to-face courses were constantly decreased in after 10 years. 10 percentage online courses followed by students in the year of 2004 which was equal number students the year of 1994. The popularity of mixed media courses more doubled and 35% students enrolled in such courses.
Overall, the mixed media courses will more students pursue in the next period.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-07-22 dhruv j patel 77 view
2018-05-31 Jazz Brar 86 view
Essays by user dhruv j patel :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of 2004 which was equal number students the year of 1994. The popularity of mixe...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86413043478 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47466641587 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54347826087 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.5676495008 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.7 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339349649069 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151689757896 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957179936291 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216195737783 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103401501934 0.0819641961636 126% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.