Road accidents are more frequent these days and claim many lives each year. As a result, some people suggest that drivers should take regular driving tests throughout their lives, rather than one single driving test, to improve the situation. What do you think are the advantages and disadvantages of repeat driving tests?
Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages
Recently, there has been an exponential increase in the number of accidents occurring on roads along with the equivalent growth in traffic-related deaths. Therefore, in order to tackle this problem, it is suggested that there should be more driving tests, rather than only one taken by drivers. In my opinion, although this activity can contain both positivity and negativity, I suppose that the drawbacks can overperform the benefits due to the waste of time and effort that authorities and drivers have to put on these exams
On the one hand, it is true that one test is not enough for people to be proficient in driving. In detail, the practice of taking regular tests can help drivers to fulfill their knowledge about driving that they may have forgotten as it was a really long time ago since they last learned about this. In addition, these tests can also enhance their driving skills as well as ensure their ability in driving. For example, driving tests include both theories and practices, so people taking these tests can not only be provided with more useful tips and information but also equipped with more essential skills and measures to deal with real problems that usually take place on the roads
On the other hand, driving tests can bring a greater deal of shortcomings when they demand a host amount of money, time and effort from not only drivers but also the governments. In fact, it is undoubtedly that if there were more driving examinations held, authorities would have to use their budget to recruit more judges assessing the examinees, which is really wasteful, when this money can be instead invested in facilities-improvement or support the underprivileged residents. Moreover, it is also impossible for people who drive every day to forget about the traffic rules and it would be really problematic for them when driving tests are not free in some countries as well as they have to take these tests over and over again in short periods
To conclude, many people claim that taking driving tests regularly can help reduce the number of road accidents. Nonetheless, I believe that it is unnecessary to do that since it can require a large amount of money and is time-consuming for both drivers and governments. Therefore, the disadvantages should be highly considered, instead, authorities should hold more national campaigns about some common misunderstandings in their driving policies to spread these messages to a larger scale of people
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-29 | khuekhue | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-29 | khuekhue | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-29 | khuekhue | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-17 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 89 | view |
| 2021-06-17 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 89 | view |
- The table below shows the production of cocoa beans in six regions between 1992 and 1998 tonnes 67
- Many parents today organise extra classes for their children after school and at the weekends Do you feel that this is a worthwhile thing to do or do you feel children have enough education at school 61
- Some people say free time activities for children should be organized by parents Others say that children should be free to choose what they do in their free time 61
- In some countries small town centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores As a result people without cars have limited access to out of town stores and it may result in an increase in the use of cars Do y 67
- Village of Chorleywood showing development between 1868 and 1994 Chorleywood is a village near London whose population has increased steadily since the middle of the nineteenth century The map shows the development of the village 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, really, so, therefore, well, for example, i suppose, in addition, in fact, in short, as well as, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2068.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 410.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04390243902 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86695256565 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50487804878 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 20.2975951904 202% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 111.434330437 49.4020404114 226% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 206.8 106.682146367 194% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.0 20.7667163134 197% => OK
Discourse Markers: 18.4 7.06120827912 261% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326100041938 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134504310578 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681760083969 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211558109915 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051233115365 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.8 13.0946893788 174% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.3 11.3001002004 171% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.84 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.78957915832 199% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 10.1190380762 182% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.