Humanity will be able to drastically reduce the use of fossil fuel
Some experts believe that most people use up a lot of energy generated from fossil fuel unnecessarily and the rate at which renewable energy sources are being implemented is not sufficient to decrease the usage of fossil fuel. However, I believe that humanity will be able to reduce the usage of fossil fuel.
Firstly, most inhabitants of the planet are more educated and more aware of the limitation of fossil fuel. There has been a recent increase in the number of people who use electricity frugally or prefer public transportation over private vehicles. For instance, when I started to study at a university it took me more than an hour to get to there, however, just after a couple of years my commute shortened to thirty minutes. The traffic on the road decreased owing to lesser number of vehicles and the number of vehicles decreased because of a successful campaign about saving fossil fuel. The government ran that very successful campaign and made people aware of the benefits of using public transportation and how driving less can result in lower usage of fossil fuel. It is a remarkable example of how people these days care more about the planet and understand the importance of decreasing the usage of fossil fuel.
Secondly, while most people are still reliant on non-renewable energy sources there has been a surge in usage of energy generated by renewable energy sources. For example, during summer now we get most of energy from the solar panels that we have mounted on our roofs. Since, more and more renewable energy sources are being used, it is possible that usage of fossil fuel will come down.
Lastly, news or media are actively educating people about climate change and how reduction in usage of fossil fuel can help the world. My uncle always kept the TV on after watching the news, but recently after learning the about the benefits of reducing usage of fossil fuel he no longer carelessly keeps the TV on, instead ensures that everyone in the household does not keep any electrical appliance turned on unnecessarily. As more people are being careful, it can be assumed that usage of fossil fuel will decrease.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-23 | prakriti malla | 76 | view |
| 2021-09-23 | khush.furia | 92 | view |
| 2021-08-02 | arifsadi19 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 520, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat usage of fossil fuel will decrease.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, lastly, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1780.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 366.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86338797814 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57181483368 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505464480874 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.8721085687 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.142857143 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317244199203 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136864431568 0.076458572812 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149906720853 0.0737576698707 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221112857252 0.150856017488 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13621499632 0.0645574589148 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.