In any profession-business, politics, education, government-those in power should step down after five years. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The speaker asserts that any field of leader should step down after five years. In political, educational field, the leader’s in power should not more or less than five years too much. Some people think the stepping down after five years is unpractical; However, presidents’ election prove this is a practical way. Therefore, I agree with the speaker.
To begin with, in the realm of politics, stepping down too slow has a negative effect on country, since country’s leader would become a dictator. If a country’s leader is a dictator, he or she will make people panic, for there are no opponents can stop dictator. For example, Adolf Hitler is a dictator; In the second world, he orders his country’s people on the front in second world war without minding people’s lives; Such was a brutal decision that many people died in the war. Lacking opponents’ confrontation, there are no one can stop him, and stop the war. In sum, stepping down too slow might make country’s leader becoming dictator, which has negative effect on country’s people.
On the other hand, stepping down too fast has also a negative influence on students, because educational institute’ leader cannot force an effective policy that is helpful for students. An effective policy need time to fulfill. To ensure the policy can be forced successfully, leader should not step down too fast. For instance, educational ministry in Taiwan is changed so fast that the admission requirement test is modified frequently. And then, Taiwan’s admission test has been criticized by public for a long time. In a word, in the educational field, leader should not step down too fast in order to ensure an helpful policy can be forced.
Finally, some people reckon that leader should not step down in five years, since relying on new leadership to revitalize the country is not practical. However, presidents’ election that are five years in many countries proves this policy is practical and helpful for the country. As presidents’ policies need time to fulfill, 5 years is a perfect time making the police can be forced successfully. If the polices is useless, new leader can stop the policy after taking office, and improving the country’s policies. The United States’ election can be an example; After taking office, Joe Biden forces economic policy and plan to combat COVID-19. With his policy and plan, people can look forward to improving the country’s economy and reducing the casualty because of COVID-19. In a brief, to improve country, governments are needed to revitalize after 5 years.
To sum up, politicians stepping down too slow has a negative effect on country’s people; Whereas institute’s leader stepping down too fast has also an negative influence on students. Proving by presidents’ election, stepping down after five years is practical; Thus I agree with what the speaker says.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-29 | mei_unavailable | 83 | view |
| 2022-05-13 | Skittle_Mix07 | 70 | view |
| 2022-03-12 | Siam | 66 | view |
| 2021-12-16 | Sunita086 | 50 | view |
| 2021-10-19 | bomavo | 83 | view |
- We learn our most valuable lessons in life from struggling with our limitations rather than from enjoying our successes Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your positi 50
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your posi 66
- As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take I 50
- Several recent studies have shown a link between health and stair usage One recently completed study shows that people who live in stairs only apartment buildings that is buildings without elevators live an average of three years longer than do people who 58
- Humans have long been fascinated by elephants the largest land animal in the modern world Social animals that live in herds elephants are native to both Africa and Asia Their large ears long trunk and long life span have made elephants one of the most cap 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y. Therefore, I agree with the speaker. To begin with, in the realm of politics,...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 614, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...t step down too fast in order to ensure an helpful policy can be forced. Final...
^^
Line 9, column 149, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... leader stepping down too fast has also an negative influence on students. Proving...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, look, second, so, then, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, for instance, more or less, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2436.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 472.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16101694915 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80694994059 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449152542373 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 732.6 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 4.38483146067 365% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.8269417428 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.21951772744 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171440777386 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655813375619 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543387066967 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123105111737 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648079613434 0.0667264976115 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.