TASK 2; Online communication is becoming more popular than face-to-face communication in many companies. Do the advantages of this outweigh its disadvantages?
It is a phenomenon when doing everything on the Internet, especially the interaction in many firms is increasingly becoming a trend, which replaces offline communication. In my book, I believe that this tendency brings about more benefits than drawbacks.
On the one hand, there are some foreseeable drawbacks of communicating via the Internet. Firstly, due to having access to digital gadgets tremendously, people are prone to many mental illnesses when not being able to interact with real friends and colleagues. For example, a co-worker of mine suffers from depression which impacted adversely the effectiveness in working and solving job-related problems. Secondly, face-to-face communication would help to reduce the risk of misunderstanding which many enterprises might encounter in online meetings. By contrast, by participating in an offline conversation, attendants are allowed to capture details, contents, and opinions in an explicit way.
On the other hand, I hold the view that meeting through social platforms could possess some benefits these days. Because of the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in the whole globe nowadays, having an online discussion would be a better option to mitigate and minimize the rate of contagious cases occurring on a daily basis. More importantly, these businesses might be allowed to operate and maintain their works at the right pace in lieu of being procrastinated by this severe circumstance. Moreover, firms could be able to cooperate and sign business contracts with foreign partners via online conferences. As a result, this creates more opportunities for these companies to develop and broaden their trade market in the long term.
In conclusion, despite some aforementioned disadvantages of this trend, I am still inclined to the positive impacts of organizing businesses following the technological trend of the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-03 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-20 | san_uti | 84 | view |
- Whether or not someone achieve their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 78
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some people believe that the only purpose of films is to entertain But others say films should have educational value Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Nowadays many people cannot read or write What problems does this cause What measures can governments take to solve these problems 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 676, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an explicit way" with adverb for "explicit"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...capture details, contents, and opinions in an explicit way. On the other hand, I hold the view...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6013986014 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24452916984 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63986013986 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6413934775 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.230769231 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203209443028 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617125960718 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668534609659 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104923966233 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431279176923 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.