The maps below show Hunderstone town at present and a proposed plan for it. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The given maps illustrate some changes to Hunderstone Town between the present infrastructure and a future plan for this area.
Overall, the town is projected to experience considerable changes during the period shown. The most noticeable differences between the two maps are the appearances of the roundabout and the main road leading to the town center.
Currently, there is an Art field to the Northwest of the railway, which is predicted to be replaced by an Industrial field. At the same time, from the railway, a footpath leading to the Industrial zone is also likely to be constructed. While the town center, the ring road, and the build-up area are still projected to remain unchanged, there is likely to be a construction of a roundabout connecting the town center to the A2 road in the middle of the railway.
Turning to the other features, we can see that in the future, next to the new round-about a gas station can be built. Meanwhile, the plan also proposes to build a road which links the A4 road to the A2 road to the South of the railway. Additionally, two main roads running to the town center and the A4 road in the exterior of the town are predicted to be constructed in the proposed plan.
- In many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects What are the causes And what will be the effects on society 78
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 73
- The charts below show the proportion of people s spending on different commodities and services in a particular European country in 1958 and in 2008 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of people of different age groups who went to cinema once a month or more in one European country from 2000 to 2011 73
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1007.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70560747664 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83774162586 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490654205607 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3117503004 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.888888889 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151407677433 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701924002819 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669314183376 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113561594797 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619120437078 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.