The chart gives information about the growth of urban population in certain parts of the world including the prediction of the future.
The bar chart manifests urban encroachment scenarios in various parts of the world in 1950 and 2000 and presents the predictions in 2030.
Overall, there was a significant escalation in municipal population globally. Notably, Latin American being the highest records throughout the given timeline whilst the worst came to Africa figures.
As can be observed, 40% of civilians in Latin America lived in urban areas in 1950 and it outnumbered the remainder. Africa and Asia have only roughly 10% of its population living in the city center, being 20% lower than the average ratio of the world. After 50 years, the proportion of urban population in Latin America managed a rise to 70% while that in Africa and Asia recorded at nearly 40% equally.
Turning to the future forecasts, the global population which settled in urban areas is predicted to increase from 49% to 60%, compared to a slight growth by 10% anticipated in the figure for Latin America. After being expected to go through a similar trend, the respective projection in the indicator of African and Asian was 51% and 57% of total dwellers in 2030.
- The chart gives information about the growth of urban population in certain parts of the world including the prediction of the future 78
- The table shows changes in exporting goods in a country in 2000 and 2010
- The graph shows the number of marriages and disvorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000 78
- The chart below shows changes in the number of international students in Australia in 2019 and 2020 78
- The chart below shows changes in exporting goods in one country in 2009 and 2010
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99465240642 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67269496014 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620320855615 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6299635432 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.75 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196227870895 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797617706326 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075861056569 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120128779564 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717235081979 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.