The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years 1995 and 2005
The pie charts illustrate the difference in of energy production such as gas, coal, petrol, nuclear and others in the course of 10 years, starting from 1995.
Overall, it is clear that while the production of gas, coal, nuclear and other energy witnessed an upward trend, the opposite was true for petrol. Additionally, after 10 years, the rate of coal energy was still the highest.
In 1995, the highest percentage of energy production was coal with nearly 30% (29.8%), the second was gas with 29.63%, 0.27% less than coal. The energy in third place was petrol with 29.27%, compared to under a tenth in the proportion of nuclear (6.4%) and other energy (4.9%).
After 10 years, the percentage of coal energy production experienced a slight increase to almost 31% (30.03%), still the highest. The second still belonged to gas, which increased slowly to 30.31%. However, the figure for petrol witnessed a dramatic decrease of over 9% to nearly a fifth (19.55%). The minority were nuclear and other energy, but both increased moderately to about 10% and 9%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-13 | andrew0411 | 61 | view |
| 2020-07-02 | Pham Mai Nguyet | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows information about students in six main subjects at a US university in 2010 92
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years 1995 and 2005 61
- The chart below shows the expenditure of 2 countries on consumer goods in 2010 91
- The bar charts below show the percentage of boys and girls aged 5 14 taking part in cultural activities and sports in Australia in 2003 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, still, third, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94915254237 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45290148954 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559322033898 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3258028911 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3333333333 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136838350608 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637597945985 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688164448478 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110114777842 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754310758357 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.