The chart show that time spent on two devices according to various categories. Describe the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The two pie charts compare the amount of spending time which people use on smartphones and tablets.
Overall, people will use tablets for gaming, others, reading news, and listening to music and videos more than smartphones. By contrast, smartphones are used for surfing social networks and utilities which is spend more time than tablets. Game is the application that people use most on two kinds of devices.
First of all, 35% of the time is used for games by smartphones which are less than tablets by 22%. In addition, the figure for others, listening to music and videos on tablets is more than smartphones by 3%,5% respectively. The percentage of reading news on both types of these electric devices is lower than 5%.
On the other hand, 29% of going social networking is used by smartphones which are twice higher than tablets. Moreover, the time spending on utilities by smartphone is 20%, while tablets take up at 17%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-15 | buiminhduc | view | |
| 2021-09-13 | buiminhduc | 73 | view |
- more and more people now own cars What are the problems associated with an increase in the usage of private cars How these problems can be solved 56
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading To what extent do you agree Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer 78
- Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land What solution is better 11
- more and more people now own cars What are the problems associated with an increase in the usage of private cars How these problems can be solved 56
- Some people think that children should aim their best at what they are doing Others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 209, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
... social networks and utilities which is spend more time than tablets. Game is the app...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, so, while, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 775.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90506329114 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60919976424 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518987341772 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 16.758266801 43.030603864 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.1111111111 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0642688004392 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0356389843172 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358920757846 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.055744102646 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391146425047 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.