similar products can be found everywhere
It is said that countries are becoming more similar nowadays because the same products can be found anywhere in the world. Take as an example clothes from zara, food from mcdonalds, or drinks from starbucks. These brands can be found anywhere in the world. I believe this is a positive development. In the following paragraphs, I will prove that having the same products all over the world is both convenient and safer.
Finding almost the same products all over the world can be significantly convenient. For instance, people who live abroad may find it hard to eat or dress as the natives there. This can hinder their life there and make it much harder and inconvenient. However, some would prefer to try new products as a way to know more about new cultures, many others can not change their lifestyles especially if they are living abroad, not just tourists. Being able to buy the same products they are used to can help them avoid feeling alienated. This is one major reason why having the same products in all countries can enhance people's lives.
Second point is that having the same food and clothes all over the world is safer for the poor people. To illustrate, if each country can have their own products, the quality of these products will surely depend on the country’s resources. Hence, the poorest countries will eventually have the lowest quality for all their products which means a worse lifestyle with unhealthy food and poor quality of products. Having the same types of goods all over the world can enhance ans positively develop these poor countries, not to mention the great economic influence from having major brands in your country. This is another great positive influence showing why I would support such a topic.
Finally, The modern world aims at a safer, more convenient and healthier world with less envy among the nations. The equality that can be achieved through having the same goods all over the world is a key motive for a better lifestyle and more tolerant nations. I recommend that all governments should give a space for universal brands in their countries,
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-13 | amota | 73 | view |
| 2020-02-16 | sonamsharma | 87 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, hence, however, if, may, second, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1747.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86629526462 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47396731443 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515320334262 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3181695593 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9473684211 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8947368421 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.05263157895 7.06120827912 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249014469745 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944467829772 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111963166492 0.0667982634062 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167430042777 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103795959865 0.056905535591 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.