Topic: Globalization is harming people more, rather than doing good. For example, most contagious diseases are spreading at an unprecedented faster pace due to advanced global communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement?
The sphere of globalization stands out as an issue that has made inroads into many respects of human lives, specifically detrimental effects. In my underpinning, I partly concur with this phenomenon and the subsequent paragraphs will examine my viewpoint.
On the first hand, it is doubtless globalization has brought about a wealth of perks corroborated by ensuing reasonings. Integrated world ushers in the entailment of cultural interchange as people can stand a good chance of having mind-blowing experiences and gaining insights into other awe-inspiring cultures. Ostensibly, the fast-moving and dynamic global industry will be an auspicious job market for well-qualified job-seekers and that stimulates greater innovation and developments in products and technology.
On the flip side of the coin, there remain a number of drastic drawbacks concerning globalization that should be given proper consideration. One of the most salient matters is the brain drain what lies at the bottom of the delocalization triggering off unemployment in developed countries. Ineluctably, globalization also abates the exploitation of cheap labor forces in underdeveloped nations. To illustrate, children under 18 in some African countries are overexploited to do manual works under bad working conditions without proper Gantt task or incentive compensation. Another conspicuous issue is the social inequity since the amalgamation of culture more often than not culminates in racism, xenophobia, intolerance, and loss of national identity.
From my vantage point, globalization does both good wonders and harm to human beings. However, the entailing ravages outweigh the dividends when it comes to a globalized world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 428, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ations. To illustrate, children under 18 in some African countries are overexploi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88047808765 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43313039996 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.729083665339 0.561755894193 130% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2055842341 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.83333333333 7.06120827912 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186851855378 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557983247418 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0215082019808 0.0667982634062 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0978694164907 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208159644233 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.