You should spend 40 minutes on this task. Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic -
Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the
responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?
You should write at least 250 words.
Use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and with relevant evidence.
The United Nations has its roots from the end of the Second World War when leaders of different states agreed to help each other cope with the vestiges of the said war. The idea was that, with the sharing of the particular expertise of each member country, all countries will ultimately benefit. One’s strength could be another’s weakness and vice versa. Hence cooperation was forged among the member nations. To this day, the United Nations is helping particular countries in need. Cooperation is a by word where different issues from food to education addressed by all member states.
For developing countries, food is given more importance than education. This is due to the nature of food being an urgent necessity. As a result, education takes a back seat and the general population is left ultimately illiterate. With the number of developing countries in this condition, the world may suffer from the ills of hunger and illiteracy if no one will step in to help and solve this matter.
For this reason, developed countries using the model of the United Nation may be able to extend a hand in providing resources to the developing ones. In return the latter may be able to share some expertise on their end as a bilateral exchange. In essence, both parties are able to benefit, bringing the concept of the United Nations cooperation model into fruition. As the saying goes, no man is an island and in this case, it may be said that no nation is an island as well.
- the diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Australian Bureau of Meteorology 78
- Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones Is this a positive development or a negative one 73
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both views and give your 73
- You should spend 40 minutes on this task Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The United Nations has its roots from th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 371, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...d be another’s weakness and vice versa. Hence cooperation was forged among the member...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cation addressed by all member states. For developing countries, food is given ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tep in to help and solve this matter. For this reason, developed countries usi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, second, so, well, as for, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1228.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.796875 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59657225973 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546875 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7923974646 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7142857143 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78571428571 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192250590614 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645456546798 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473203496972 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127798780275 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437324421904 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.