The pie chart below shows the results of survey, in which undergraduates and postgraduates were asked about the range of books and non-print material in their school library.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The charts compare the proportion of rating in the range of books and non-print materials from undergraduate and postgraduate in their school library.
Overall, as can be seen from the pie charts, most undergraduate votes were very good in non-print materials, whereas the opposite was true for the postgraduate.
Undergraduates chose the range of books as very good and satisfaction was almost the same at 37% and 35%, while the figure for postgraduates choosing very good and satisfaction was 22% and 28%. Furthermore, the percentage of undergraduates choosing as not good in the range of books was 28%, which was two-third of the figure for postgraduates.
The proportion of undergraduates choosing non-print materials was very good, at 68%, which was almost fourfold the figure for postgraduates, at 16%. In addition, the proportion for postgraduates who rated not very good was 62%, while the figure for undergraduates was only 12%. Both undergraduate and postgraduate voted for satisfaction with the non-print materials was the same, with 20% and 22% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-03 | 12345-6789 | 87 | view |
| 2021-10-03 | 12345-6789 | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | Kuwinder singh | 44 | view |
| 2018-06-26 | Rapunzel | 71 | view |
| 2017-07-01 | lauranguyen | 63 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the results of survey in which undergraduates and postgraduates were asked about the range of books and non print material in their school library Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make co 87
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The pie chart below shows the results of survey in which undergraduates and postgraduates were asked about the range of books and non print material in their school library Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make co 61
- The diagrams below give information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 11
- The diagrams below give information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 68
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, third, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44047619048 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42137140821 2.65546596893 129% => OK
Unique words: 75.0 106.607317073 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446428571429 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.7979590785 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 130.571428571 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190625540139 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127984184289 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873534702316 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166160169473 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0963880305282 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.