The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Greatness is decided by someone's good "decisions" if he or she is powerful; caring nature of individuals, or someones success and achievements. In my opinion, I partially agree with the argument that greatness is decided by succeders and not by contemporaries. However, Contemporaries can also decide greatness because of two reasons.
First of all, the ideals of someone who sacrificed their life for nation are considered as great by their next generation. People after their generations will be motivated by them because of their assiduous work. For instance, Mahatma Gandhi, The father of India is ideal of todays generation of not only India but also of another Countries. Students teach a lot about him in history subjects and learn about their sacrifices for their nation. Hence, Students can decide greatness of Mahatma Gandhi even after 70 years of period of Independence of India.
Secondly, If a person cares and provides nourishment to his people, the people will remember him or her forever because of his attention to someone. For instance, Mother Terreasa, who sacrificed her life for orphans and children never will be forgettable. She raised the orphans with a great hardwork and make them educated, and successful people. And hence, Even today people respects her about her caring nature.
However, the people who are living contemperorily, also find greatness in someone. For example, sports players who works very painstakingly to win for their nations in Olympics or in any competition. We can see greatness of luminous football player Ronaldo who is not only a virtuoso player but also good gentleman in real life. He helps poor people and respects them. So, contemporary people for him also decide his greatness.
In sum, It is true that greatness of individual can be decided by people who live after them. But simultaneously, contemporary people can also see someones greatness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-15 | s.sim | 50 | view |
| 2023-01-02 | Kuldip851 | 66 | view |
| 2022-10-04 | SUDIPTA BARUA | 62 | view |
| 2022-07-22 | yomi idris | 62 | view |
| 2021-12-26 | ulligadda sreeja | 50 | view |
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 55
- The council of Maple County concerned about the county s becoming overdeveloped is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county But the council is also concerned that such a restriction by limiting the 81
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them not by their contemporaries Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you ta 50
- Claim The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models Reason Heroes and role models reveal a society s highest ideals 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... respects her about her caring nature. However, the people who are living conte...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, first of all, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 307.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27361563518 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0665464616 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 215.323595506 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521172638436 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5035562906 60.3974514979 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.2105263158 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1578947368 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63157894737 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231666968446 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841181624418 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583038271449 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146994533074 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505921979153 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.