In times of an economic crisis, in which area should governments reduce its spending? 1. Arts 2. Scientific research 3. Parks and public gardens.
When people facing the pandemic world since 2020, their countries are also severing from the economic crisis due to the lockdown of all the activities. It is crucial that the government reduce the budget to improve the economic crisis. Some people may think that the research of science is reliable while others state that the creation of arts and parks could take advantage. In my opinion, I agree with the idea that government spends less money on scientific research for the following reasons.
First of all, most scientific research is supported by universities and private companies. In other words, it is not the government’s duty to invest money in scientific research. For example, the vaccine of COVID-19 was all invented by private companies because they have rich academic resources and a budget for the study. In Taiwan, the government just spend twenty million dollars on buying the vaccine with the biologic’s corporation. However, if the government decide to invent vaccine by themselves, they have to hire experts, construct the research building, or purchase a lot of equipment. As a result, the budget of scientific research would be extremely high and take an unrecoverable economic crisis.
Second, the government is responding to improve the public space and perverse the art pieces as a part of welfare because the policy could improve people’s lives as soon as possible. The government is the owner of the art pieces and the land of open space in the whole city, they should manage them. To be specific, In New York, the city government invests money to update the masterpieces of the City Art Museum, this policy helps to release the citizens' stress immediately when they enjoy the artistic atmosphere. Also, the construction of Central Park would be redesign and recycle every year to provide a place for people to relax. The financial investment of those fields not only enhances the citizens’ living quality but also helps them back to their works concentratedly especially during the economic depression.
To conclude, the consideration of art and public space is valuable because it brings a better life for citizens. In contrast, spending money on scientific research is unimaginable. Therefore, I strongly comment that governments have to reduce the investment on scientific research than arts and parks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-07 | Wei Huan Chueh | 80 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to solve the problem of the present and the future it s necessary to understand the past 83
- the problems in Everglades may cause it to disappear in the future 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement the best way to reduce air pollution is for the government to raise the cost of fuel 90
- In times of an economic crisis in which area should governments reduce its spending 1 Arts 2 Scientific research 3 Parks and public gardens 80
- In recent years many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live for example fro 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, still, therefore, third, while, as to, for example, for instance, in contrast, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1714.0 1373.03311258 125% => OK
No of words: 338.0 270.72406181 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07100591716 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57542636852 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 16.0 8.23620309051 194% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.6220508784 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 4.45695364238 247% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196040694552 0.272083759551 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537455468224 0.0996497079465 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543368302687 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0992175971336 0.162205337803 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556298751594 0.0443174109184 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 63.6247240618 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.