In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Todays technologies enable us to read book on electronic devices and what's more, we can store hundreds of thousands of books on devices like Amazon's e-reader. This makes some people believe that people will stop printing books and in the future, everything will be digitalized.
Electronic books and newspapers have many advantages. They are easy to use and rech. They can be stored in computers, mobiles, e-readers and in cloud in huge amounts and are available at any. The cost of manufacturing and printing is completely removed, which reduced their prict. Digital books and newspapers also have one very important advantage-they are environmentally friendly. No paper is used to print magazines and books, which means less are cut from our forests to produce papers. All of these factors convinced many people that digital versions of books and magazines is more convenient, ethical and cheaper choice.
Dn the other hand, traditional printed books and magazines have existed for centuries and I believe they have created some kind of emotional connection and value for people. When a man reads a book and he likes it, he most probably would like to have it in a form of a tangible thing Books are a form of art, like statues and paintings. You can have an of some famous painting, but the painting itself has some intangible value. Magazines and newspapers do not have such a value in .
Based on this, I believe that the amount of books are printed will decrease considerably and maybe even dramatically, however printed, tangible books will still be demanded by people as they have some aura and value in addition to the things that are written inside.
I do think, though, that there is a big chance magazines and newspapers will move into the online world completely. This is because they are published in huge numbers daily and weekly and monthly and no one needs them after years. Printing so huge amount of articles will demand additional recources and make them less competitive even in terms of price.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 84
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2005 2010 and 2015 about McGill University 78
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 73
- The chart and graph below give information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
... to read book on electronic devices and whats more, we can store hundreds of thousand...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...alue for people. When a man reads a book and he likes it, he most probably would ...
^^
Line 7, column 302, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orm of a tangible thing Books are a form of art, like statues and paintings. You ...
^^
Line 7, column 484, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...d newspapers do not have such a value in . Based on this, I believe that the am...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, so, still, in addition, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 1.00243902439 998% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 25.0 6.8 368% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 5.60731707317 535% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 965.302439024 175% => OK
No of words: 340.0 196.424390244 173% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97352941176 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 3.73543355544 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69059945499 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 106.607317073 180% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564705882353 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 283.868780488 190% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 1.53170731707 653% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6890072775 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4705882353 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.29411764706 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 3.70975609756 350% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280308692556 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891252623531 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569442475619 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166770616388 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425823997274 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 40.7170731707 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.