A few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the use of others is rapidly declining. Is it a positive or negative development?
Several languages have been increasing their global coverage, leading to the decreasing extent of popularity of other spoken languages. From my perspective, language homogeneity exerts more positive effects than a variety of systems of words and sounds.
On the one hand, it appears that using the same languages can benefit information acquisition and conveyance. To be more explicit, effective communications require mutual understanding about the importance of accuracy, consistency, and transparency of used words. Sharing the same languages in various programs, such as medicine, technology, and science can accelerate the process of knowledge acquisition among people rather than information misunderstandings. In addition, taking global companies is an example. When foreign managers sent emails to report important affairs such as new business strategies, and additional details of new contracts, employers had to use communicative channels to translate them into my host countries. As a result, it seems that they miss out on important information and updates on account of a lack of disparities among demographics and cultures regarding languages
On the other hand, language variety can bring several merits. First and foremost, language varieties pave the way to explore cultures. It can be assumed that understanding many languages can gain great insight into national backgrounds, customs, and behaviors. Slangs, for instance, a popularly local way of communication in many countries, can help foreigners understand how they are formed and how important they are, avoiding unexpected tensions and having the greatest respect among them. Furthermore, traditional values are believed to develop sustainably. Songs, poems, or fairy tales seem to be preserved and gained inherited values among next generations and Therefore, multilingualism will be deemed to foster the civilization of mankind.
In conclusion, despite the great convenience of sharing common languages that facilitate information acquisition and conveyance, I personally believe that cultural identity and traditional values are probably closed to the diversity of language
- A few languages are increasingly spoken in di erent countries while the use of others is rapidly declining Is it a positive or negative development 84
- A few languages are increasingly spoken in di erent countries while the use of others is rapidly declining Is it a positive or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 902, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...raphics and cultures regarding languages On the other hand, language variety can ...
^^^
Line 3, column 667, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erited values among next generations and Therefore, multilingualism will be deeme...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, regarding, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1846.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93569131833 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27392460421 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630225080386 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.4253538437 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.857142857 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2142857143 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135081083348 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489503628343 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407832013297 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0894936278014 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439173142256 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.17 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.72 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.