the veracity of stories about Bredan's voyage
Both the reading and the lecture are about the accuracy of the stories presented in the old manuscripts regarding the Brendan's travel to North America. In this vein, the passage has presented three arguments to support the validity of the stories. On the other hand, the professor is not convinced of this and casts doubt on each of the theories presented in the passage. Having categorically rejected the arguments, he is of the opinion that none of these theories are precise and valid.
To begin with, the author argues that the stories has eluded to the places that the crew has visited during their voyage. Accordingly, Brendan's crew had visited several islands in order to avoid hazards of a prolong voyage on the sea. This argument is challenged by the professor. According to the speaker, the story posits that one of the places is Faroe island owing to the evidence of ships. However this cannot be true because ships also could have been raised in other places. Moreover, the lecture states that burning hills cannot specifically refer to the island mentioned in the story merely because of the active volcano that exist in this place; however it could have referred to hills that people set fire on them.
Secondly, the reading states that a team of researchers has made a copy of the Curraghs that Brendan has traveled with it to illustrate the possibility of their travel by this mean. Contrastly, the professor's stance is that this was not a precise copy of their Curraghs since it was longer which is respectively more powerful and possess more sails. Therefore, the lecturer is of the opinion that this more powerful boat may be capable of traveling 8000 km even if the smaller boat of Brendan could had not.
Finally, the passage mentions associate the discovery of old marking resembling the alphabet called ogham in the Brendan' time to their voyage. On the other hand, the professor opposites this notion by asserting that merely some of the markings resemble the ogham. Then, the speaker put forth to the idea that since these marking contains images of sun and other objects, and the ogham was totally consisted of alphabets, so, the markings do not contributes to ogham. He posits that they may be scratched by native American who used to curve pictures on the stones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-29 | zahra.tmmm | 3 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 55, Rule ID: ELUDED_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'alluded to'?
Suggestion: alluded to
... the author argues that the stories has eluded to the places that the crew has visited du...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 207, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...al islands in order to avoid hazards of a prolong voyage on the sea. This argument is cha...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 396, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... island owing to the evidence of ships. However this cannot be true because ships also ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...ir travel by this mean. Contrastly, the professors stance is that this was not a precise c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 499, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...en if the smaller boat of Brendan could had not. Finally, the passage mentions ass...
^^^
Line 4, column 223, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...es this notion by asserting that merely some of the markings resemble the ogham. Then, the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 445, Rule ID: DONT_NEEDS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'contribute'?
Suggestion: contribute
...d of alphabets, so, the markings do not contributes to ogham. He posits that they may be sc...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, finally, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, as to, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 30.3222958057 198% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1902.0 1373.03311258 139% => OK
No of words: 392.0 270.72406181 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85204081633 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48544283227 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 145.348785872 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497448979592 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 598.5 419.366225166 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7178801726 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.882352941 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0588235294 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.82352941176 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0701966420649 0.272083759551 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0232125690922 0.0996497079465 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400306827034 0.0662205650399 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0401435285388 0.162205337803 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411434959219 0.0443174109184 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 63.6247240618 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.