The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000, 2005 and 2010.
Given is the bar chart delineating the proportion of young people who received higher training in three distinct intervals of 5 years, commencing from 2000.
Perceptibly, all of the mentioned countries experienced a plunge in the rate of learners who pursued the educational path, except for the plateau in the rate of country B. Furthermore, country D achieved by far the highest percentage of those students during the shown years.
In 2000, the proportion of students receiving higher education in country A accounted for the lowest level of 37% while the reverse was true for country D with 45%. Thenceforth, both the two rates leaped exponentially to their zeniths of 58% and 60% respectively in 2010, which were 10% higher than five previous years recorded rates.
When it comes to the percentage of the tertiary scholars in country C, it escalated moderately from 42% to 48% in the first five years and then plateaued in the latter half of this course of time. Meanwhile, there was a fluctuation in the vicinity of 40% recorded in that of country B during the reported century.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Panama City from 2010 to 2019
- The maps give information about a university sports court 73
- Nowadays more and more people have access to the Internet But constant availability of any information worsens people s memory and critical thinking skills 78
- Many people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside Other believe that there are health benefits of living in cities Discuss both views and give your opinions 89
- Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show the history and culture of their own country rather than works of other parts in the work Do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 14, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...rs, commencing from 2000. Perceptibly, all of the mentioned countries experienced a plung...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, then, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94535519126 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85400791228 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628415300546 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2978412378 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.285714286 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197630570056 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809988702563 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851421675634 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121001118561 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0966736931121 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.