Nowadays celebrities are mainly famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements, and this sets a bad example to young people. To what extent do you agree and disagree?
It is common in the contemporary world, that many eminent people are primarily known for their fame and affluence rather than their talents, which has a negative impact on the younger generations. I completely agree with this statement. The reasons are twofold.
To begin with, most celebrities potraying their opulence are usually infamous for wrong reasons since they do not have an actual skills to present to audience. For instance, The Kardashians, are well-known for simply being filthy rich and flaunting their extravagant lifestyle. In reality, they hardly have any commercial success. So, young people want to achieve same kind of stratum in society. They have a feeling that anyone can become wealthy by following in the footsteps of such people. Hard work and education, therefore, takes a back seat. If youngsters are not educated or dedicated to working hard, they can face dire repurcussions in the future since less educated people in ordinary socitey are not able to make a proper living.
Furthermore, youth may try to emulate the way of life of super-stars, and as a result, may turn into a prodigal person. In order to defray the expenses of luxurious life, they may resort to crime. The chances of juvenile delinquencies may rise. Besides this, they may also find themselves in deep debt, which may take years to pay off. Obviously, when youth faces such problems, it is imminent that they appear to face severe depression and anxiety issues. The more young people try to imitate their favourite star, the greater injurious impact it can engender.
To conclude, it is a sign of decadence of the younger generation who follow those known people who are well-known for their glamourious life and opulence in lieu of their successful work, since they relinquish hard work and education, tend to commit crime, and suffer mental illness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-26 | Mohammed Idris | 56 | view |
| 2021-11-07 | RamInd | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-07 | RamInd | 78 | view |
| 2021-05-02 | Kamran2555 | 92 | view |
| 2021-01-26 | vyhanh | 61 | view |
- The government is responsible for protecting a nation s cultural identity Some people think it is the government s duty to ensure that new buildings are built in a traditional style To what extent do you agree 93
- Social media enable people to keep in touch with each other and learn about news events Do advantages outweigh disadvantages 83
- There are different customs in different countries related to how people eat dress and so on Some think that people visiting a country should behave according to customs of the country they visit To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Analysts tell us that many people today feel stressed and think they have insufficient control over their lives What problems do such feelings cause for people What remedies could you suggest 84
- Nowadays because of digital technology it is possible for not only studios but also individuals to produce their own films Do you think this is a positive or negative development 93
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'skill'?
Suggestion: skill
...easons since they do not have an actual skills to present to audience. For instance, T...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, well, for instance, kind of, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08496732026 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69310392461 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614379084967 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.6723017038 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5294117647 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204629656035 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581860745886 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677768437936 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134038167861 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602561257263 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'skill'?
Suggestion: skill
...easons since they do not have an actual skills to present to audience. For instance, T...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, well, for instance, kind of, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08496732026 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69310392461 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614379084967 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.6723017038 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5294117647 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204629656035 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581860745886 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677768437936 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134038167861 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602561257263 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.