The pie charts show how the earnings of a middle-class American household were spent(in per cent) in 1976 and 2006. Summaries the information given and make comparisons wherever relevant.
The pie chart show how the earning of a middle class American household were spent in 1976 and 2006. In overall, there were change in earning spent in 1976 and 2006 for Transpotati, housing and entertainment.
The earning spent on Transportati doubled from 23% in 1976 to 45% in year 2006. The earning on housing reduced one third from 44% in 1976 to 14% in year 2006.
The two type of were spent in which earning spent approximately same in 1976 and 2006 which are Pensions and Healthcare. The earning spent on Health care were 9% in 1976 and it were 8% in year 2006. The Pensions were 10% in 1976 and it were 8% in 2006.
The earning spent on foot at home double than year 1976 in 2006 which were from 7% to 14%. The entertainment were major change in earning spent 1% in 1976
which were 10% in year 2006.
In conclusion, in overall the entertainment category were earning spent 9 times more as than in 1976. Earning spent on Transportati, Food at home were double than 1976 in 2006.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-17 | Anirudha Balaji Shirsikar | 56 | view |
| 2021-11-17 | Anirudha Balaji Shirsikar | view |
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a journal on environmental issues Over the past two years the Mantle Magnesium Miners MMM has purchased over 20 000 square miles of land in the tropical nation of East Genovia Mining magnesium on this la 66
- Working professionals were asked to fill up a questionnaire with the questions related to why they pursue education The first chart shows these factors while second represents their opinions about who should contribute towards the course fees Summaries th 84
- Space research is not a cheap investment Do you feel the cost of this research is justifiable in terms of its return 56
- The best way to teach is to praise positive action and ignore negative ones 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of student housing at Buckingham College To serve the housing needs of our students Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories Buckingham s enrollment is growing and based on current 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...rom 44% in 1976 to 14% in year 2006. The two type of were spent in which earning...
^^^
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...2006 which are Pensions and Healthcare. The earning spent on Health care were 9% in...
^^^
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...9% in 1976 and it were 8% in year 2006. The Pensions were 10% in 1976 and it were 8...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... 10% in 1976 and it were 8% in 2006. The earning spent on foot at home double th...
^^^
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...1976 in 2006 which were from 7% to 14%. The entertainment were major change in earn...
^^^
Line 10, column 86, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ategory were earning spent 9 times more as than in 1976. Earning spent on Transpor...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
third, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.46448087432 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48764152505 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 73.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.398907103825 0.547539520022 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 209.7 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 17.7060478998 43.030603864 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.2727272727 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6363636364 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.81818181818 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382157438974 0.215688989381 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.226181124134 0.103423049105 219% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138928328786 0.0843802449381 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249235433442 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128963767347 0.0819641961636 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 97.53 61.2550243902 159% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 3.6 10.3012195122 35% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.29 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.07 8.06136585366 75% => OK
difficult_words: 19.0 40.7170731707 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.