some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading people to buy their products. Other people think advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it.
discuss both views and provide your opinion
One group of people believe, advertisment has been really successful in making people buy products ,while others think people got familiarised with advertisments, thus they wont focus on it anymore. The following essay aims to discuss points and provide examples on both prespectives
First of all, Ad campign has proven to be successful in increasing sales of a company. From Multinational to small scale businesses, CEO’s and board of members plan to spend more than 30% of their budget on marketing. Evidence of this is published in business insider a famous international journals, where it quotes, many corporations spend more than one-third of its budget on marketing and advertising alone. A survey was conducted by university students studying MBA in a prestigious university, it was aimed to find how the sales was affected in respect to people who saw the ads of a produts, and the results were astonising, more than 70% of people preferred the product they saw on the advertisements. Crucial reason why these companies succeed in selling their products, is directly related to the medical professionals like psychologist, who work for these firms, research on how brain reacts to certain ques given in advertisments. They incorporate this knowledge, in order to hack people’s mind and increase their sales.
On the other hand, some people argue, advertisements has no effects on people, as it has become extremely common. In recent times, major firms started overdoing adverts, which made its customers extremely annoyed. In addition, awareness has being created by media and a few journalist, they debunked how big corporations manipulate the human brains. Many people started realizing how adverts take advantage of people innocence by using either a well-known personality or using culture appropriate content in some countries. Adverts are everywhere and has become inevitable,which can be frustating at times, for instance, people see adverts in televisions, radios, newspapers. Hence people become so familiar with all kinds of adverts and started feeling adverts won’t grasp enough attention among general public as it done before.
To summarize, as far as I am concerned, a single contributor for success of the company or its product can be given to marketing department and their catchy advertisments, where prodcut quality, and its neccessaity are often considered seconday. Well, adverts has been around for so long time, and it made so many organization grow exponentially, as time passed people grew tired of it. As this might be the time for the organizations to focus on producing better products and improving customer service, than just relying on ads.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-17 | sangeeth28 | 89 | view |
- The diagram below represents the Comparison of how urban Chinese spent across major categories in 1995 versus the spending habits in 2011 Summarise the information given in the diagrams Write at least 150 words
- two maps show road access to a city hospital in the years 2007 and 2010 summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 67
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where possible 73
- some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled they say the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement to what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...successful in making people buy products ,while others think people got familiaris...
^^
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'journal'?
Suggestion: journal
...business insider a famous international journals, where it quotes, many corporations spe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 590, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n respect to people who saw the ads of a produts, and the results were astonising...
^^
Line 5, column 271, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun journalist seems to be countable; consider using: 'few journalists'.
Suggestion: few journalists
...reness has being created by media and a few journalist, they debunked how big corporations man...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 573, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , which
...are everywhere and has become inevitable,which can be frustating at times, for instanc...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 677, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...rts in televisions, radios, newspapers. Hence people become so familiar with all kind...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 798, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...erts won’t grasp enough attention among general public as it done before. To summarize, as ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 310, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun organization seems to be countable; consider using: 'many organizations'.
Suggestion: many organizations
...around for so long time, and it made so many organization grow exponentially, as time passed peop...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, really, second, so, third, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2273.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 424.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3608490566 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08148413193 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 176.041082164 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603773584906 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 705.6 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.8742386837 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.0625 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303987379962 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942514379648 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938039131686 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190127842777 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0960813277019 0.056905535591 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 78.4519038076 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.