Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching. With the technology available today there is no justification for it, and everything should be done online. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The development of technology opens more effective ways of online teaching, while learning offline is an old-fashioned manner. Personally, I completely disagree with the idea that giving lectures in auditoriums is an old-fashioned way because, on some sides, spending time in auditoriums is way more efficient.
On the one hand, many people choose to take online courses because they are convenient. With online courses, they are allowed to learn anywhere at any time they want. For instance, online lectures can be watched and can be paused so they can watch later. Moreover, people do not have to carry bulks of paper or some heavy books around, what they need is just a device that can connect to the internet for online courses. Therefore, with flexibility and convenience, online courses are popular among people.
On the other hand, there are some people who prefer traditional learning to online courses. Traditional learning allows students to interact face-to-face with their teachers. For example, to what they don’t understand, the teacher just needs to look at the reaction of the learner to know whether or not they understand. Besides, in traditional studying, the students can have a connection with the lectures better than looking through a screen.
In conclusion, online learning gives people flexibility and convenience whilst, traditional studying gives an opportunity to interact with the teachers and clear the wonders. In my opinion, online courses cannot replace traditional learning because the connection between students and teachers is a crucial point in learning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-18 | vuhieuquy | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-04 | Ranjeet brar | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-23 | Vinuki | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-12 | jagrit sharma | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-12 | jagrit sharma | 78 | view |
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places And how to increase its popularity 56
- International community must ensure that all countries reduce the consumption of fossil fuels such as gas and oil To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 60
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree Provide relevant examples if necessary 56
- In many countries major cities have become too big and overcrowded Why is it happening Give the solution to this problem 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aused so they can watch later. Moreover, people do not have to carry bulks of pap...
^^
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... at the reaction of the learner to know whether or not they understand. Besides, in traditiona...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, look, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42570281124 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88008653852 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550200803213 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3169695047 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.923076923 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1538461538 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237208017568 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862787452842 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559422642601 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150201574684 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612296262297 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.