The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014.
The illustrations detail modification that occurred in a town named Darwin from 2009 to 2014.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the town became more residential with more households. In addition, the most noticeable change was the conversion of industrial area into trees and the areas saw no change were school, lake and swimming pool.
In 2009, there were only industrial area and 3 residential buildings to the south of the town, while in 2014, the field for industry was replaced by a number of trees. Moreover, the area was also separated by a footpath leading from west to east to make way for pedestrians. It is interesting to note that there were the addition of university and more residential buildings which were adjacent to the old ones.
Another striking alteration was the transformation of the industrial area surrounded by the circular footpath into a new swimming pool nearby a lake and a row of trees. Besides, no change was made to the 2 swimming pools outside the footpath, school, convention center and fishing area. Finally, the year 2009 had not had harbor on the sea in the eastern side of the town, but the next ten year saw the introduction of this infrastructure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-06 | maiphuonganh | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | baoquyen1906 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | phamkhuyen | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-14 | ThHuong | 87 | view |
| 2023-03-18 | kieutrangkg1 | 78 | view |
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 73
- Large companies use sports events to promote their products Some people think this has a negative impact on sports To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In some countries men and women are having children late in life What are the reasons for this development Do the advantages of this outweigh its disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
... into trees and the areas saw no change were school, lake and swimming pool. In 2...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, if, look, moreover, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1024.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92307692308 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90906306721 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.6259898936 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.777777778 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166503672118 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741317226933 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571794398315 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119765725027 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042345236634 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.