One of the best ways to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many opinions show that can raise at the price of energy is one of the great ideas in decreasing environmental contamination. I disagree with that idea and other measures should be discussed.
On the one hand, the increase in the budget for fuel will affect directly the necessity of gas for vehicles. As a result, when the charge of fuel goes higher, many drivers seem to have consideration and want to find alternative energy sources such as solar power. Thus, the carbon dioxide will decrease and the environment goes better. However, that is just a short solution. For a reason, energy is essential for many household equipments. Because of that, a majority of middle-class families and poor families have to suffer bad conditions without gas. Therefore, in a long run, many environmental contaminations will have not solved.
On the other hand, in my opinion, there are other better solutions for the environmental problems. Firstly, the government gives some policies to reduce pollutions. For example, the government can encourage their residents to recycle plastic rubbish, so that can minimize the amount of plastic litter. For example, they can create some events about recycling topics so many people can take part in. Moreover, using renewable power like solar power or wind power is a good choice to bring down the rate of environmental issues. Secondly, people's awareness should be considered to be one of the main factors. The government should educate young people and raise the awareness of citizens about the importance of nature. Furthermore, the government should take action in using abandoned land and non-renewable resources.
In conclusion, raising the price of oil is not the way to reduce pollution. Government policies and education should be two of the most remarkable solutions for environmental matters.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-10 | tsln7607 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-15 | Anhhhhhh | 78 | view |
- The flow chart illustrates the consequence of deforestation Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 78
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 67
- In some countries more young adults continue to live with their parents even after they have completed their education and found jobs Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 2005 84
- Students leave high school without learning the way how to manage their money What are the reasons and solutions of this issue 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, as for, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25510204082 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96449012062 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56462585034 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3738399277 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.3157894737 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4736842105 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.78947368421 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151082758227 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0463468755144 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513288421491 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945476455304 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0133821074517 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.