Some people want to meet each other in person to communicate while others want to telephone instead of face to face communication Which of these communication methods do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people want to meet each other in person to communicate while others want to telephone instead of face-to-face communication.
Which of these communication methods do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.

A group of people wants to talk directly, while others want to telephone. For me, I prefer to communicate face-to-face for the following reasons.

The first reason why I choose face-to-face communication is that it is more convenient than through the telephone. People needn’t depend on technical devices too much. For example, if they are stolen their telephones or do not have an internet connection, that will be terrible for them, especially on important vacations. Besides, individuals are able to discuss with each other more easily when they meet. For instance, when making a vital decision or planning a project, they may discuss and exchange ideas together without worrying to have unexpected maintenance.

The second reason is that people can be more close-knit than commuting through a screen. Because they meet and show their emotions together, have some meals. An illustration of this is that my friends do not talk to others for a long time, but when they arrange to have dinner together, they are still close as they were in high school.

Last but not least, face-to-face communication helps them be more effective. They could concentrate and focus on works or talking more because there are no notices from social applications and they have to respect others. For instance, my brother is a student and he always checks his notifications from Facebook while studying online through Zoom (an application for educating), but he cannot do this while studying at school.

In conclusion, both face-to-face communication and talking to others by using phones have their own benefits. However, I still like to communicate directly more than through a phone for some reasons above.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-12-05 Leylines 67 view
Essays by user Leylines :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, still, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21532846715 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89403171628 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583941605839 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.035843986 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264306353108 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106006282269 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0891382750608 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188099434188 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103951660785 0.056905535591 183% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.