Some people think that social networking sites have a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is apparent that online networks have gradually become an indispensable part of every single person over the globe in these modern days. However, besides the advantages, some people consider that the disadvantages of these platforms outweigh their benefits. From my perspective, I believe that these social sites not only make people spend time on them unconsciously but also threaten organizations and national reputations.
On the individual level, using online networks wastes our time and leads to the pessimistic growth of mindset. There is a huge number of people consuming half-days on TikTok or Facebook for entertainment pleasure, such as updating news from relatives, chatting with friends instead of putting concentration on their work or study. Besides, every day, numerous pieces of news are published on the Internet and not every content is carefully censored, which may lead to their reduced quality and accuracy. As a result, they could affect adolescents’ attitudes, especially for those who are in puberty and become more sensitive, they would be misled and tend to follow these naughty actions. Recent research demonstrates that the number of teenagers addicted to online platforms is increasing significantly, step by step withdrawing themselves from real-world interactions.
On the community level, social networking sites also damage the organizations’ prestige and national security. Certain groups of people could take advantage of social media to release unfavourable information about their rivals, or a reactionary party may use their freedom of speech to public fake news about a country. Both of these actions will lead to social chaos as inhabitants’ belief in their leaders may be ruined, and once national security is destroyed, that country could be put in a dangerous situation. History has proved that there are numerous examples of nations that were damaged by the sabotages of abroad organizations through online platforms or some companies vacillated when competitors published unverified information about them.
In summary, the dangerous elements coming from social networking sites have had various negative impacts on daily life on both levels, individual to society, and it is necessary for everyone not to be dependent on these platforms.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-31 | trpg143 | view | |
| 2024-07-31 | trpg143 | view | |
| 2023-06-28 | Baobestfriend | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-04 | truong3011 | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-03 | truong3011 | 56 | view |
- In many countries today people buy a range of household goods television microwave oven and rice cookers Is it a positive or negative development 11
- Many people believe that universities should be for students with at least 1 or 2 gap years working outside to find out their real ambition and suitable ability while others think that students should enter into universities or colleges right after gradua 67
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 89
- The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, so, in summary, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1954.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59885386819 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04022668574 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598853868195 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.2504507871 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.307692308 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8461538462 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69230769231 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172073478733 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611920054205 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576515641801 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121506215159 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645387370033 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.