tree
Both the reading and the lecturer discuss about whether the genetically modified trees are more productive and strength enough to servive or not. The former argues that the genetic modified trees are great for three reasons where the latter contradicts each of these points made by the reading.
First of all, the author contends tht, the genetically modified trees are designed to survive in the adverse conditions and have a great advanyage over the normal trees in order to control over the pest. In contrast, the lecturer argues that, although the normal trees have less resistive against the pest but they have chance to servive few of them in the adverse natural condition and on the attack of a pest. however the genetically modified trees re designed in a certain coding to survive in certain condition and type of pest and if the natural climate change certainly or a new type of pest attack, their entarilly population get destroyed and weeped out.
Secondly, The reading asserts that, genetically modified trees are economically good since they grow fast and can have a greater return to the farmer. however, the professor rebuts that, they have some hidden points that is you have to pay the money for the seeds to the producer each and every time you use their seeds which raise their cost.
Finally,
the text claims that, genetically modified trees are work as an agent to save the native endanger trees from decline by controlling the overexploitation of the wild trees. On the other hands, the listening vounters that, since the genetically modified trees are grown faster they out conuter the native trees for resources like suunlight, water and nutritions and thus are dangerous to the native trees extinction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-16 | degew59415@eryod.com | 75 | view |
| 2024-04-16 | degew59415@eryod.com | 80 | view |
| 2024-01-25 | joyce05 | 71 | view |
| 2024-01-25 | joyce05 | 61 | view |
| 2024-01-15 | saamaan | 90 | view |
- hails 73
- frog 70
- In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States—birds in particular. Unfortunately for birds, these trends are likely t 73
- whales 60
- In the 1950s Torreya taxifolia, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya will soon become extinct. Experts 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 413, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... condition and on the attack of a pest. however the genetically modified trees re desig...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 413, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: however,
... condition and on the attack of a pest. however the genetically modified trees re desig...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 152, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...an have a greater return to the farmer. however, the professor rebuts that, they have s...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 398, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'trees'' or 'tree's'?
Suggestion: trees'; tree's
...ns and thus are dangerous to the native trees extinction.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, in contrast, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 289.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04152249135 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51210119437 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519031141869 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 21.2450331126 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.8614355675 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.888888889 110.228320801 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1111111111 21.698381199 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7777777778 7.06452816374 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384186452537 0.272083759551 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197870538641 0.0996497079465 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110164282704 0.0662205650399 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253115689457 0.162205337803 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123516540064 0.0443174109184 279% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.3589403974 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 53.8541721854 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.0289183223 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.498013245 141% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.