Some people argue that technological inventions, such as mobile phones or the Internet, are making people socially less interactive.
Do you agree or disagree?
Smartphones and the Internet are detrimental to social interaction. While those technological inventions can isolate individuals, I believe that their creative potential for communication outweighs this downside.
The advancement of technological breakthroughs has sparked a debate about the negative aspect relating to social alienation. The advanced technologies have changed people’s lives from the real world to the virtual world as people are more addicted to gadgets and spend less time interacting with people in their vicinity. There is a fact that, even when eating with family or gathering friends, youngsters are likely to spend an enormous amount of time chatting on Facebook or watching videos on Tiktok rather than talking Consequently, less interaction and face-to-face communication, in reality, may result in a decrease in social abilities.
Although there are significant downsides to technological developments, its advantages are undeniable. With the growth of the Internet, new technologies still gain ground due to the ability to solve the conventional constraints of space and time with a dizzyingly wide range of communicative possibilities. Social platforms such as Zalo or Facebook in these advanced gadgets enable people working or studying abroad to keep in touch with their family. Therefore, it is an indispensable part of life for people to help connect freely and easily with no geographical batteries.
In conclusion, both detrimental and advantageous impacts of technology on social interaction need to be placed on a pedestal to be evaluated. It is an individual’s responsibility to balance between these aspects to bring the most value of technology advancement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-29 | Lam Boi Ngoc | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 523, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing videos on Tiktok rather than talking Consequently, less interaction and face-...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74015748031 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4390344072 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.633858267717 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.7277834505 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.545454545 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241135641014 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847634765675 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515615058818 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131692536049 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387617618913 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.