As earth runs out of natural resources, we have started to look to space for solutions. However, some people argue that this is the wrong thing to do, and instead we should look for alternative solutions here on earth.
In recent decades, the world has been implemented space exploration for addressing the natural resources depletion. Having said that, there is a school of thought that this endeavor is absurd and looking for alternative remedies is superior. From my perspective, I completely advocate for this outlook for reasons provided below.
The first compelling rationale is that the expenditures allocating to space discovery are exorbitant such as labor recruitment, infrastructure, resources, among many others. In fact, in light of taxing peculiarities of this domain, it requires experts possessing superb attributes, namely a profound and thorough understanding of this sphere, intestinal fortitude and a robust wellbeing, the wage to pay them is therefore definitely high. In addition, this undertaking would draw on a substantial amount of fossil fuels to blast off space probes or satellites, thereby adding natural resources deficit and exacerbating the status quo.
Another legitimate justification elucidating why it is not worthwhile to continue this task is that seeking for other habitable planets is far-fetched, and even if this effort came to fruition, transporting resources to Earth would prove in vain. In order words, it takes million or even billion years for a spacecraft to reach the nearest stars, by which time human race would no longer exist. Furthermore, it is more desirable to give precedence over realistic solutions. Nowadays, renewables is gaining traction and constitute to be a silver bullet for natural resources exhaustion and the exploitation of automatic cars in myriad countries is the epitome of this trend.
In conclusion, although human are confronted pressing issues referring to the natural property, which ignites aspiration to unfold the enigma of the cosmos as a bid for valuable solutions, it is more favorable to carry out practical missions, and the galaxy exploration should be put on the waiting list.
- Some educationalists argue that non exam arts based subjects such as music drama art and craft should be compulsory in the secondary school curriculum They believe that activities such as these can improve overall academic performance to what extent do yo 89
- Some educationalists argue that non exam arts based subjects such as music drama art and craft should be compulsory in the secondary school curriculum They believe that activities such as these can improve overall academic performance to what extent do yo 84
- Nowadays people are working from home using computers and telephones What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development 89
- Some educationalists argue that non exam arts based subjects such as music drama art and craft should be compulsory in the secondary school curriculum They believe that activities such as these can improve overall academic performance to what extent do yo 89
- Some people think that the range of technology currently available is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people Others think that it is causing the opposite effect Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
... exploration for addressing the natural resources depletion. Having said that, there is a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 584, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...s or satellites, thereby adding natural resources deficit and exacerbating the status quo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...prove in vain. In order words, it takes million or even billion years for a spacecraft ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 564, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...itute to be a silver bullet for natural resources exhaustion and the exploitation of auto...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, look, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52842809365 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13825738444 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658862876254 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.4622283201 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.272727273 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1818181818 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.72727272727 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239102643166 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825150159693 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544548255461 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132780344873 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699583510735 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.05 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.